This research by a Canadian blogger casts doubt on a whole range of reports contained in the vast IPCC document which was supposed to be the unimpeachable source of scientific truth on which the world's governments were to enact legislation to "save the planet".
After the recent email leaks followed by the ridiculous claims about Himalayan glaciers disappearing by 2035, no doubt others will take a critical look at the rest of the document. Who knows what other skeletons will be uncovered? It's looking as though anything scary went in with hardly any checks at all.
Thanks so much for the honorable mention. I have a follow-up post about Greenpeace-generated literature in the Nobel-winning climate report. It's available here:
ReplyDeletehttp://nofrakkingconsensus.blogspot.com/2010/01/greenpeace-and-nobel-winning-climate_28.html
One of the things I've discovered is that the IPCC head, Dr. Pachauri, has written at least one forward for a Greenpeace publication. This strikes me as rather cozy...
All the best,
Donna Laframboise
NOconsensus.org