Friday, 12 October 2012

THE PERILS OF CONFIRMATION BIAS

This article by Matt Ridley looks at how the IPCC operates in such a way that they set out to confirm the hypothesis of CO2 causing catastrophic global warming by allowing no contrary ideas to be examined. It is the very opposite of the scientific method in which a hypothesis should be examined in a critical way. Every student should see this and so should our politicians.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Climate Science welcomes your views/messages.

Post a Comment