Monday, 23 March 2015

THE CLIMATE PROPAGANDA WAR HOTS UP OVER CYCLONE PAM

This piece highlights the exaggerations being put out as facts by activist climate scientists. This is desperate stuff and may well be counter-productive as more of the public realise they are being fed with propaganda rather than given balanced information.

Christopher Booker has also commented on this in his weekly column in the Telegraph.
 

1 comment:

Dan Pangburn said...

First came the discovery that CO2 change has no significant effect on average global temperature and therefore climate sensitivity is not significantly different from zero. http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com

Next came the realization that a forcing (such as some consider CO2 to be), or its anomaly, in Joules/sec/m/m must exist for a duration to change energy content, Joules/m/m. Thus the time-integral of the forcing, or the forcing anomaly, equals the energy change. (Energy content change divided by effective thermal capacitance = temperature change). This, using accepted assessments of paleo CO2 levels, proves that CO2 change has no significant effect on climate.