tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1881436054697063063.post9200999160231362348..comments2024-03-28T12:58:23.680+00:00Comments on climate science: MORE CLIMATE PROPAGANDA ON THE BBCDerek Tipphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07893712146272196994noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1881436054697063063.post-49889557768223009642015-03-11T22:15:25.697+00:002015-03-11T22:15:25.697+00:00Why is the BBC propagandizing in favor of "cl...Why is the BBC propagandizing in favor of "climate change?" <br /><br />They are heavily invested in it. See <a href="http://australianclimatemadness.com/2010/02/07/bbc-pension-fund-invested-in-climate-companies/" rel="nofollow">here,</a> and also <a href="http://thesequal.proboards.com/thread/262" rel="nofollow">here</a><br /><br />There are other good sources of info on that, but I don't have them bookmarked on this computer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1881436054697063063.post-70638935000430221122015-03-09T15:05:47.943+00:002015-03-09T15:05:47.943+00:00The analysis at http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com de...The analysis at http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com demonstrates that CO2 has no significant effect on average global temperature (AGT). Because CO2 is a trace gas, no significant effect on AGT also means no significant effect on climate.<br />It and the peer reviewed paper at Energy and Environment, vol. 25, No. 8, 1455-1471 identify the two natural factors that do explain average global temperatures (95% correlation since 1895) and credible trend back to the depths of the Little Ice Age (around 1700). <br />This work proves that ‘climate sensitivity’, the effect on AGT of doubling CO2, is not significantly different from zero.<br />Dan Pangburnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07898549182266117774noreply@blogger.com