This site is a reference point for those with a cool head for climate science, arguably the most political science ever. When the government and most of the media concentrate on alarmism, this site is the antidote for those who don't believe the scare stories - YOU ARE NOT ALONE! (blog started on 7/11/07) We have over 1.9 million hits and blog is updated regularly most weeks.
Sunday, 28 February 2010
NEW POLL - CLIMATE SCEPTICISM INCREASES
This new poll confirms the trend away from belief in man made global warming. Despite the government's massive spending on propaganda the trend continues to run away from them.
The rigors of scientific discipline demand.inter alia,that a theory imply the kind of evidence that would prove it wrong.Predictions based on the theory are checked against the facts.If something occurs that should'nt have,and vice versa,the theory is discarded.The principal AGW alarmists themselves lament that they cannot explain the lack of warming.Ergo the AGW theory has been discredited.Einstein said that it would not take 100 scientists to prove him wrong.One fact alone would suffice.I have one response to those who ask me what would happen if I was wrong.Iwould ask that person to specify what would prove him wrong.After all,the onus of proof is on those made the claim that AGW is an established fact.I don't have to prove or disprove anything.In other words,put up or shut up.The comprehensive rejection of the Emissions Trading Scheme in the Australian Parliament clearly demonstrates that the public has had enough of the lies,cheating,filibuster,spin and obfuscation.BTW,a sceptic is defined as one who does not accept or reject a proposition without critical rational analysis.
I believe humans have are at the very least, partially to blame for global warming, and I believe we need to work together to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. I write these words to give courage and support to anyone else who feels the weight of this problem and wants to help.
The rigors of scientific discipline demand.inter alia,that a theory imply the kind of evidence that would prove it wrong.Predictions based on the theory are checked against the facts.If something occurs that should'nt have,and vice versa,the theory is discarded.The principal AGW alarmists themselves lament that they cannot explain the lack of warming.Ergo the AGW theory has been discredited.Einstein said that it would not take 100 scientists to prove him wrong.One fact alone would suffice.I have one response to those who ask me what would happen if I was wrong.Iwould ask that person to specify what would prove him wrong.After all,the onus of proof is on those made the claim that AGW is an established fact.I don't have to prove or disprove anything.In other words,put up or shut up.The comprehensive rejection of the Emissions
ReplyDeleteTrading Scheme in the Australian Parliament clearly demonstrates that the public has had enough of the lies,cheating,filibuster,spin and obfuscation.BTW,a sceptic is defined as one who does not accept or reject a proposition without critical rational analysis.
I believe humans have are at the very least, partially to blame for global warming, and I believe we need to work together to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. I write these words to give courage and support to anyone else who feels the weight of this problem and wants to help.
ReplyDelete