This new video by Paul Burgess clearly explains how the poor standard of temperature data makes accurate measurements impossible and yet the whole climate change narrative depends on this data. This inherent weakness is never mentioned and is completely ignored by those who are desperate to keep the public believing, and hence willing to put up with the restrictions that are to be put on them.
Science is not as sloppy as the doubters claim they are. The reality of temperature science is quite good.
ReplyDeletehttps://skepticalscience.com/surface-temperature-measurements.htm
The warming trend is the same in rural and urban areas, measured by thermometers and satellites, and by natural thermometers.
https://skepticalscience.com/surface-temperature-measurements-intermediate.htm
Numerous studies into the effect of urban heat island effect and microsite influences find they have negligible effect on long-term trends, particularly when averaged over large regions.
https://skepticalscience.com/surface-temperature-measurements-advanced.htm
Independent studies using different software, different methods, and different data sets yield very similar results. The increase in temperatures since 1975 is a consistent feature of all reconstructions. This increase cannot be explained as an artifact of the adjustment process, the decrease in station numbers, or other non-climatological factors. Natural temperature measurements also confirm the general accuracy of the instrumental temperature record.