CO2 IS A BENEFIT, SO LET US GIVE THANKS

The Scotsman, 16 March 2016

DON’T believe computer prophets of doom, writes Dr Keith P Dawson, vice President at the Scottish Society of Crop Research

Last month’s major scientific breakthrough was rightly lauded; Einstein’s century-old gravitational wave theories proved correct. How will we view current theoretical climate science in 2100? Will there be global headlines confirming validity or a consigning to history’s dustbin?

So far prospects are worrying, with climate computer predictions, on which costly taxpayer-funded policies are based, well wide of measured reality. In terms of temperature increase, ocean acidification, sea levels and polar ice, predictions have massively exaggerated what is happening. Polar ice and bear populations are now larger than when Al Gore made doomsday predictions ten years ago. This is the year Arctic ice vanishes completely, remember?

The “burning” question is the real extent to which CO2 influences global temperature. There was cynical “rebranding” of global warming as “new improved” climate change; when it became clear measured data showed no significant global warming since 1998 and still doesn’t. This despite models predicting large increases and CO2 increasing over the period, so why trust future predictions; up or down? The sensitivity of models to CO2 is now challenged, they may “run hot” by up to 300 per cent, models ignore clouds, key climate factors.

There’s a big difference between climate and weather – despite perceptions global extreme weather damage is actually decreasing, as are climate-related deaths, according to the UN. El Nino was by far the most important 2015 factor, as in the warmer 1999 and 2011. Media sadly ignore the positive narrative.

So CO2: Hero or Villain? A pollutant according to the US EPA or celebrated as Patrick Moore, GreenPeace founder, suggests? Without CO2 Life on Earth dies. Without CO2, no green plants, no grazing animals, food chain or humans, no wonderful nature documentaries!

Parents with sick children rely on thermometers rather than computer models falsely running Hot. Despite the claims of data-manipulating activist-researchers and politicians, the science is not “settled”. By its very nature, science is never “settled” – the only people who claim that are non-scientists or charlatans or both.
Scottish Government policies based on these models cost Scottish households significant and increasing sums. They drive the poor into food and fuel poverty and divert funds from healthcare, education and research, damaging industry through uncompetitive energy costs.

Since colleagues and I published pioneering research on greenhouse emissions in the early Eighties, the search for scientific truth has too often been hijacked by quests for funding and profile on the multi-trillion dollar climate gravy train. Let’s be clear: there is no such animal as a “Climate Change Denier” – who could deny impacts of climate change over millennia? Vikings cultivated Greenland, Romans tended Yorkshire grapes, even our glens testify to change – the only constant. Only flat-earthers deny change. The “denier” myth is a cynical activist construct to marginalise genuine questioning of the science, which should be welcomed. […]

Recent film The Big Short tells the true story of cynical herd behaviour by banks in the sub-prime market, causing the 2008 global economic collapse. Current climate science and politics has many of the hallmarks of the sub prime disaster. Once again, the gamble is taken with our money and hits the poorest hardest. Public faith in science will, tragically, be part of the collateral damage when the Emperor’s state of undress finally becomes evident. In a democracy people are entitled to their own opinions – but not to their own facts.

• Dr Keith P Dawson is vice President at the Scottish Society of Crop Research

CAN INDIVIDUAL CLIMATE EVENTS BE ATTRIBUTED TO GLOBAL WARMING?

This article goes into this question very thoroughly.

GLOBAL WARMING AND THE IRRELEVANCE OF SCIENCE

This article by scientist Richard Lindzen discusses the issue of political leaders using science to promote their policies without any facts to back up what they are saying. He is right and this whole subjects brings science into disrepute.

WILL THE EPA OBEY THE COURT OR WILL IT IGNORE ITS RULING?

That is the question that is being asked about the USA's Environmental Protection Agency that has been introducing climate change legislation by the backdoor, when the Senate would not support it. This article looks at this question and tries to find the answer.

RE-ASSESSING THE ROLE OF CO2 IN CLIMATE

Here is an interesting look at the evidence for CO2 causing dangerous climate warming. It confirms what we already suspect - that there is no good evidence for it. It is a very thorough look at the evidence and well worth reading.

CLIMATE ALARM MESSAGE NOT RESONATING WITH MUCH OF THE PUBLIC

This piece explains the research that concludes that no matter how the message is put it still doesn't seem to resonate with a lot of the public who remain stubbornly sceptical. I am not surprised as their problem is that the "message" simply doesn't accord with what they see of the actual climate.

USA ATTORNEY GENERAL LOOKS INTO PROSECUTING 'CLIMATE CHANGE DENIERS'

Luckily I live in the UK where free speech is still just about allowed, but across the Atlantic it seems there are some in high places who want to limit it. I just cannot believe they will get their way. Definitely not if Donald Trump gets elected!

The Daily Signal, 10 March 2016

Hans von Spakovsky

In news that should shock and anger Americans, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that not only has she discussed internally the possibility of pursuing civil a_ctions against so-called “climate change deniers,” but she has “referred it to the FBI to consider whether or not it meets the criteria for which we could take action.”

Lynch was responding to a question from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., who urged Lynch to prosecute those who “pretend that the science of carbon emissions’ dangers is unsettled,” particularly those in the “fossil fuel industry” who supposedly have constructed a “climate denial apparatus.” Lynch is apparently following in the footsteps of California Attorney General Kamala Harris and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, both of whom have opened up investigations of ExxonMobil for allegedly lying to the public and their shareholders about climate change.

None of the public officials involved in this abuse of the prosecutorial power of the government recognize the outrageousness of what they are doing or are urging the FBI and the Justice Department to do. They want to investigate and prosecute corporations and individuals for their opinions on an unproven scientific theory, for which there is not a consensus, despite inaccurate claims to the contrary.

This not only represents a serious blow against the free flow of ideas and the vigorous debate over scientific issues that is a hallmark of an advanced, technological society like ours, it is a fundamental violation of the First Amendment. Will the FBI’s possible investigation include going after dissenting scientists who publish articles or give speeches questioning the global climate change hypothesis?

Will legislators who engage in blasphemy by refusing to recognize a scientific theory as fact and pass legislation to reduce carbon emissions be investigated, too?

The absurdity of this would be laughable if it were not so serious and so dangerous. The very idea that the FBI, the most powerful law enforcement agency in the United States, has had a referral from the attorney general of the United State to investigate whether those who disagree with the climate change theory meet the legal “criteria for which” the Justice Department “could take action” is evocative of Franz Kafka’s chilling novel, “The Trial.”

As I have noted before, this is also reminiscent of the old Soviet Union, where Joseph Stalin persecuted those whom he thought had the “wrong” scientific views on everything from linguistics to physics.  Both Lynch and Whitehouse might want to read Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s book, “In the First Circle,” in which he outlined the Soviet government’s suppression of dissenting scientists and engineers.

Or perhaps General Lynch should review the Inquisition’s persecution of Galileo Galilei for disagreeing with the consensus of his time and advocating the Copernican theory of the universe.

HOW THE UK WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY MARKET HAS BEEN DESTROYED

This article  looks at the way the market has been wrecked by the presence of subsidised wind and solar. Hence we are now seeing acceleration of increasing prices with subsidies required for all types of power station including what should be highly competitive gas. It really is amazing how easily the government intervention has destroyed what used to be a free market.

SCIENCE IS TURNING BACK TO THE DARK AGES

Melanie Phillips The Times, 4 March 2016
 Overplaying the threat to coral reefs is just the latest example of ideology distorting research



According to a new study, scientists’ claims that coral reefs are doomed by ocean acidification are overplayed. An “inherent bias” in scientific journals, says the editor of ICES Journal of Marine Science, has excluded research showing marine creatures are not being damaged.

Instead, he says, many studies have used flawed methods by subjecting such creatures to sudden increases in carbon dioxide that would never happen in real life. No surprises there. The claim that CO2 emissions are acidifying the oceans is a favourite of climate-change alarmists.

Man-made global warming theory has been propped up by studies that many scientists have dismissed as methodologically flawed, ideologically bent or even fraudulent. The problem of scientific integrity, however, goes far wider. Psychology, neuroscience, physics and other scientific areas have been convulsed by revelations of dodgy research.

Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of The Lancet, has written bleakly: “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.”

One reason is that cash-strapped universities, competing for money and talent, exert huge pressure on academics to publish more and more to meet the box-ticking criteria set by grant-funding bodies. Corners are being cut and mistakes being made.

But whatever happened to peer-review, the supposed kitemark of scientific integrity produced by the collective judgment of other researchers? Well, that seems to have gone south too. In 1998 Fiona Godlee, editor of the British Medical Journal, sent an article containing eight deliberate mistakes to more than 200 of the BMJ’s regular reviewers. Not one picked out all the mistakes. On average, they reported fewer than two; some did not spot any.

The problem lies with research itself. The cornerstone of scientific authority rests on the notion that replicating an experiment will produce the same result. If replication fails, the research is deemed flawed. But failure to replicate is widespread. In 2012, the OECD spent $59 billion on biomedical research, nearly double the 2000 figure. Yet an official at America’s National Institutes of Health has said researchers would find it hard to reproduce at least three-quarters of all published biomedical findings.

A 2005 study by John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist at Stanford University, said the majority of published research findings were probably false. At most, no more than about one in four findings from early-phase clinical trials would be true; epidemiological studies might have only a one in five chance of being true. “Empirical evidence on expert opinion”, he wrote, “shows that it is extremely unreliable”.

Underlying much of this disarray is surely the pressure to conform to an idea, whether political, commercial or ideological. Ideological fads produce financial and professional incentives to conform and punishment for dissent, whether loss of grant-funding or lack of advancement. As Professor Ioannidis observed: “For many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias.”  […]

Underlying this loss of scientific bearings is a closed intellectual circle. Scientists pose as secular priests. They alone, they claim, hold the keys to the universe. Those who aren’t scientists merely express uneducated opinion. The resulting absence of openness and transparency is proving the scientists’ undoing. In the words of Richard Horton, “science has taken a turn towards darkness”. But science defines modernity. It is our gold standard of truth and reason. This is the darkness of the West too.

LATEST CLIMATE CHANGE BOONDOGGLE BEING ADVERTISED

Below is the information sent to me about another forthcoming Climate Change Conference. What amazes me is that so many people and/or organisations are prepared to pay to come and speak at these events, let alone those who simply attend it to listen to all that propaganda. I was very slightly tempted to write in and offer to be a speaker, but I would not have the slightest chance of being accepted, unless I lied and pretended I was going to talk about the enormous risks the climate change posed. Anyway there is no way I would pay money to listen to all that guff. Did you notice that the London Museum of Archaeology are sending a speaker. What on earth has that got to do with climate change?

We are pleased to announce that the 3^rd London Planning for Climate Change Conference will take place on the 2^nd June 2016.  This Conference Series is the ideal forum in which to discuss and debate the issues that face communities and economies when it comes to planning and adapting to the problems faced by growing global climate change.  So far we have speakers from the Following organisations (full paper details can be found on the website planforclimatechange.co.uk)

 

Oxford University.

Zero Waste Scotland.

Cardiff University.

Aylesbury Vale Council.

Baylor University.

Lee International.

Università Iuav di Venezia.

London Museum of Archaeology.

Aberdeen University.

Salford University.

Internal Drainage Board. 

JBA Associates.

 

If you are interested in being a Speaker please contact us with a title /abstract and we will consider you as a speaker.  Delegate places can also now be booked for the Conference in June.

 

The cost to attend as a Speaker / Delegate is set competitively for 2016 and is as follows:

 

Speaker / Delegate - full rate: £216 (£180 plus VAT).

Student/Researcher Speaker / Delegate – reduced rate  : £108 (£90 plus VAT).

 

Details can be found at planforclimatechange.co.uk  Facebook, and Twitter.

 

If you wish to register as a delegate or speaker please access the relevant page of our website or contact us at info@planforclimatechange.co.uk and we will make the necessary invoicing arrangements

ANTI-FRACKING COURT CASE COLLAPSING - FACEBOOK SUSPENDS PRO-FRACKERS PAGE

Facebook Suspends Filmmakers Page after Campaign by Anti-fracking Activists 

Deletes Court Reports Exposing Collapsing "Pollution" Case

FACEBOOK has removed posts and suspended the page of a journalist covering a controversial court case after a targeted campaign by anti-fracking activists.

UPDATE - Facebook back down and we have succeeded in beating the censorship organized by anti-fracking activists.

Journalist and filmmaker Phelim McAleer has condemned Facebook for allowing the censorship of posts that are court reports of an important case. The attacks on the FrackNation page started as McAleer's posts on the alleged Dimock Water Pollution trial proved popular and revealed just how weak the case is.

Dimock is the village in Pennsylvania which has been described as the "ground zero"  of fracking pollution. It has featured in documentaries such as Gasland and hundreds of other national and international media articles.

Phelim McAleer, the director of the FrackNation documentary, is the only reporter permanently covering the case and his reports on the FrackNation Facebook page, before the page was shut down, revealed there was almost no evidence to back up the allegations in the lawsuit.

It is McAleer's extensive and detailed coverage that has infuriated anti-fracking activists who have been using the Dimock case as a centerpiece of their campaigns.

McAleer said the attack on his articles and videos was an attempt to censor the truth.

"Bit by bit- it is coming out that there is no truth to the Dimock allegations. I was posting many articles showing how weak the case was often just using the plaintiffs words and admissions under oath," McAleer said.

"As they have watched the case collapse anti-fracking activists have become ever more determined to censor my reports and prevent the truth from gaining a wider audience," he added.

Activists have launched a concerted campaign labelling McAleer's reports as "inappropriate content" therefore prompting Facebook to remove them. McAleer's page has now been reported so often that the page was suspended for 24 hours over the weekend.

McAleer has condemned Facebook for removing the posts and suspending the page.

"This is about justice and a high profile court case about a matter of public importance. Facebook are censoring court reports because one side does not like what is coming out under oath. They are now helping coverup the truth. This needs to stop, they need to republish the deleted posts and lift the threat hanging over the page."

Two Dimock families are suing Cabot Oil and Gas, a Texas company in a case that had gained worldwide publicity as an example of pollution following fracking.

However McAleer's reports have revealed that: 

• The plaintiffs own lawyer has told the jury that the have "no scientific evidence" that fracking fluids have contaminated the water.
• The plaintiffs "scientific" expert, Dr Tony Ingraffea, admitted under oath that he has no proof that the water was contaminated by gas drilling.
• The plaintiffs have claimed their families were poisoned but never took their children to see a doctor.
• The judge has "grave concerns" about the validity of the case.

The court case before a jury is expected to end later this week.

------------------------
EDITORS NOTES

MCALEER'S BIO
Phelim McAleer is a filmmaker and investigative journalist. He most recently produced and directed FrackNation - a documentary to uncover the truth about Fracking. He has produced documentaries for CBC (Canada) and RTE (Ireland) and two independent feature length documentaries. Before becoming a filmmaker, Phelim was a foreign correspondent for the Financial Times in Eastern Europe. He also covered Romania and Bulgaria for The Economist. Before that he covered Ireland for the UK Sunday Times. He has worked as a filmmaker and journalist in many countries including Romania, Uganda, Madagascar, Bulgaria, Chile, Indonesia, Canada and China. McAleer has appeared on or is a regular contributor to an array of international media organizations including Fox News, CNN and the BBC. He has been interviewed on over 100 US and international radio shows.

SCAREMONGERING PROPAGANDA BY LANCET REPORT

This article looks at a new report from The Lancet with some extreme claims in it. Project Fear applies in many areas of politics such as the EU referendum, but it is also prevalent in the climate debate.

FEBRUARY IS THE WARMEST MONTH IN THE SATELLITE RECORD

University of Alabama Huntsville, 1 March 2016

By a statistically significant amount, February 2016 was the warmest month in the satellite temperature record, according to Dr. John Christy, director of the Earth System Science Center at The University of Alabama in Huntsville. Interestingly, however, that record might have as much to do with an extraordinarily warm month in the Arctic as it does with warming caused by the El Niño Pacific Ocean warming event.

Globally, the average temperature anomaly in February (+0.83 C) was warmer than the previous record set in April 1998 (+0.74 C) during the so-called “El Niño of the century.”

In the Northern Hemisphere, the February anomaly (+1.17 C) was a full 0.32 C (0.58 F) warmer than the previous NH record (+0.85 C) set in April 1998. Temperatures in the tropics and the Southern Hemisphere were not at record levels in February.



While the Arctic temperature anomaly is large, big temperature swings in the Arctic region aren’t unusual, especially during the winter months. Those swings are also normally somewhat transient, so the extra heat represented in February could dissipate over the next few weeks. If that happens, it doesn’t appear the heat from the El Niño by itself will be enough to continue pushing temperatures to new records later in the year, in which case this February anomaly might stand out as a singular spike in the dataset rather than part of an ongoing trend.

The warmest months in the satellite temperature record are:

Warmest Months, Global -- How much warmer than seasonal norms
Feb. 2016   0.83 C
Apr.  1998    0.74 C
Feb.  1998    0.65 C
May  1998    0.64 C
June 1998    0.57 C
Jan.  2016    0.54 C
Aug. 1998    0.52 C
Mar.  2010    0.50 C
Jan.  1998    0.48 C
Mar.  1998    0.47 C
Feb.  2010    0.47 C

Warmest NH Months
Feb. 2016   1.17 C
Apr.  1998    0.85 C
Jan.  2016    0.70 C
Feb.  1998    0.66 C
July  1998    0.65 C
Oct.  2015    0.63 C
June 1998    0.60 C
Jan.  2010    0.60 C
May  2010    0.60 C
Mar.  2010    0.59 C

Warmest Februaries, Global
2016  0.83 C
1998   0.65 C
2010   0.47 C
2002   0.30 C
2003   0.25 C
2004   0.25 C
2007   0.19 C
2015   0.19 C
2005   0.18 C
2006   0.17 C
1999   0.17 C

Compared to seasonal norms, the warmest average temperature anomaly on Earth in February was over north central Russia, near the small town of Beloyarsky. February temperatures there averaged 5.20 C (about 9.36 degrees F) warmer than seasonal norms. Compared to seasonal norms, the coolest average temperature on Earth in February was over the Sea of Okhotsk, between the Russian mainland and the Kamchatka Peninsula, where the average February 2016 temperature was 3.25 C (about 5.85 degrees F) cooler than normal for February.

The complete version 6 beta lower troposphere dataset is available here:
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0beta/tlt/uahncdc_lt_6.0beta5.txt

Archived color maps of local temperature anomalies are available on-line at:
http://nsstc.uah.edu/climate/

HOW WILL GLOBAL TEMPERATURE BEHAVE POST EL NINO?

This video gives an interesting look at the effect of the El Nino that has just been occurring in the Pacific. It seems that the future course of global warming will depend on the next two or three years.

MARINE FOOD CHAIN HAS INCREASED 10 TIMES THANKS TO CO2 FERTILISATION

Science Daily, 16 January 2016

Coccolithophores — tiny calcifying plants that are part of the foundation of the marine food web — have been increasing in relative abundance in the North Atlantic over the last 45 years, as carbon input into ocean waters has increased. Their relative abundance has increased 10 times, or by an order of magnitude, during this sampling period.

This finding was diametrically opposed to what scientists had expected since coccolithophores make their plates out of calcium carbonate, which is becoming more difficult as the ocean becomes more acidic and pH is reduced.

These findings were reported in the November 26th edition of Science and based on analysis of nearly a half century of data collected by the long-running Sir Alister Hardy Foundation (SAHFOS) Continuous Plankton Recorder sampling program.

“The results show both the power of long-term time-series of ocean observations for deciphering how marine microbial communities are responding to climate change and offer evidence that the ocean garden is changing,” said Dr. William Balch, senior research scientist at Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences and a co-author of the paper. “We never expected to see the relative abundance of coccolithophores to increase 10 times in the North Atlantic over barely half a century. If anything, we expected that these sensitive calcifying algae would have decreased in the face of increasing ocean acidification (associated with increasing carbon dioxide entering the ocean from the burning of fossil-fuels). Instead, we see how these carbon-limited organisms appear to be using the extra carbon from CO2 to increase their relative abundance by an order of magnitude.

“This provides one example on how marine communities across an entire ocean basin are responding to increasing carbon dioxide levels. Such real-life examples of the impact of increasing CO2 on marine food webs are important to point out as the world comes together in Paris next week at the United Nations Conference on Climate Change,” Balch added.

THREAT FROM OCEAN ACIDIFICATION GREATLY EXAGGERATED

By Matt RidleyGlobal Warming Policy Foundation, 15 June 2010

As part of an `interview’ with me, New Scientist published a critique by five scientists of two pages of my book The Rational Optimist. Despite its tone, this critique only confirms the accuracy of each of the statements in this section of the book. After reading their critiques, I stand even more firmly behind my conclusion that the threats to coral reefs from both man-made warming and ocean acidification are unlikely to be severe, rapid or urgent. In the case of acidification, this is underlined by a recent paper, published since my book was written, summarising the results of 372 papers and concluding that ocean acidification `may not be the widespread problem conjured into the 21st century’. The burden of proof is on those who see an urgent threat to corals from warming and acidification. […]

In conclusion, I rest my case. My five critics have not only failed to contradict, but have explicitly confirmed the truth of every single one of my factual statements. We differ only in how we interpret the facts. It is hardly surprising that my opinion is not shared by five scientists whose research grants depend on funding agencies being persuaded that there will be a severe and rapid impact of carbon dioxide emissions on coral reefs in coming decades. I merely report accurately that the latest empirical and theoretical research suggests that the likely impact has been exaggerated.
 

WILL CHEAP PETROL KILL ELECTRIC CARS?

NASDAQ, 19 February 2016
Mary-Lynn Cesar for Kapitall Wire 

High gas prices tend to be good news for electric cars and hybrids. In March 2012, gas  averaged $3.92 a gallon , bringing it uncomfortably close to the record $4-plus peak seen in 2008. That same month, Toyota (TM) and General Motors (GM) reported record sales for the  Prius hybrid and  Chevrolet Volt hybrid-electric car , respectively. Today, however, the nationwide average gas price for February is  below $2.00 per gallon . Now that gas prices are at record lows, the argument that these eco-friendly vehicles save consumers money at the pump seems weak.
A look at last year's car-sales data reveals that Americans are increasingly gravitating toward pickup trucks and SUVs, which, while improving their fuel consumption, are still less fuel-efficient than electric cars and hybrids. In 2015, car makers sold an unprecedented 17.5 million vehicles , up 5.7% from the prior year and 0.4% from the record set in 2000. According to Kelley Blue Book, more than half of all transactions comprised truck and SUV sales, driving up the  average sales price to $34,428 .

Several factors contributed to last year's uptick in car purchases: increased employment, low interest rates (which means better deals on auto financing) and cheap gas. Apparently, these trends haven't extended their benefits to electric and hybrid cars: per InsideEVs, overall electric vehicle sales declined year-over-year between 2014 and 2015,  falling 5.2% from 122,438 to 116,099 . According to data from HybridCars.com, hybrid sales plummeted 14.9% from 451,702 in 2014 to 384,404 in 2015.

December was a great month for electric cars. However, as HybridCars.com  points out , this is standard for the industry, as many consumers hurry to buy eco-friendly cars at the end of the year in order to qualify for tax credits. Per InsideEVs, a  record 13,699 electric cars were sold that month, a 5.1% increase from a year earlier. HybridCars.com reports that Tesla's (TSLA) Model S was responsible for the bulk of electric car sales in December, although the carmaker doesn't release monthly sales figures.

While low gas prices have allowed Americans to return to gas-guzzling behemoths, there may still be hope for electric cars and vehicles. If gas nears $4 a gallon in the future, history suggests consumers will once again flock to the Prius, Leaf, Model S and other electrified cars.

GREEN ENERGY WILL NEVER COMPETE WITH FOSSIL FUELS WITHOUT HIGH TAXES

MIT Study: Green Energy Can’t Work Unless You Tax Everything

The Daily Caller, 25 February 2016

Andrew Follett

Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have confirmed what many in the energy world already knew: Without government support or high taxes, green energy will never be able to compete with conventional, more reliable power plants.

The study, announced by MIT’s News Office Wednesday, determined that conventional energy would be consistently less expensive than green energy over the next 10 years. The study concludes that the government could make green energy competitive by offering enormous amounts of taxpayer support.

The study confirms that green energy can only work when energy prices are extremely high and require government support. Projections from the International Energy Agency estimate that developing wind and solar power enough to substantially impact global warming could cost up to $16.5 trillion by 2030.

“Windmills, solar panels, and ethanol could not compete with coal, natural gas, and oil without mandates and subsidies even when the price of the conventional fuels was relatively high,” Myron Ebell, director of the Center for Energy and Environment at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “Now that prices for fossil fuels have plummeted, very little new renewable energy capacity will be installed unless the mandates and the subsidies are raised even higher.  The bankruptcy this week of Abengoa’s U. S. solar unit with up to $10 billion in debt is a sign of things to come.”

The MIT study also noted that solar and wind power are more than twice as expensive as natural gas, and tax on carbon dioxide emissions could increase electricity prices enough for green sources to compete. Even environmental groups such as The Sierra Club worry increasingly cheap energy will make the case for green power weaker.

“Wind and solar can’t compete with conventional sources on their own merits,” Chris Warren, a spokesperson for the Institute for Energy Research, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “That’s why the national environmental lobby and their allies are peddling the idea of a carbon tax. They want to punish the use of natural gas, oil and, coal to make their preferred sources appear more profitable. In practice, a carbon tax would have a devastating impact on American families already struggling in the Obama economy–hurting the poor and middle class the most.”
  

 

US SHALE GAS GOES GLOBAL AS PRICE COLLAPSES

Geopolitical Earthquake: Energy Price War Spreads To Gas As US Shale Storms Global Market The Daily Telegraph, 26 February 2016
 The US has exported its first shipment of natural gas in a historic move that shifts the balance of power in the global energy market and kicks off a struggle with Russia for market share. 



Surging US supply over the next five years threatens to break the Kremlin's dominance over Europe's gas market, and is already provoking talk of a "Saudi-style" counter attack by Moscow to drive US shale gas frackers out of business before they gain a footing.

At the very least, it sharpens a global price war as liquefied natural gas (LNG) bursts onto the scene, and closes the chapter on the 20th century system of pipeline monopolies. Gas is starting to resemble the spot market for crude oil, with the same wild swings in prices and boom-bust cycles.

A seven-year, $11.5bn project by Cheniere Energy finally came to fruition this week as the first LNG cargo left Sabine Pass in Louisiana - in a special molybdenum-hulled ship at -160 degrees Centigrade - destined for Petrobras in Brazil. "It is a big day for our natural gas revolution," said Ernest Moniz, the US energy secretary.

Speaking at the IHS CERAWeek summit in Texas, he said the emergence of the US as a gas superpower is a geopolitical earthquake, though he has always been coy about the exact intention. "It is a change in the energy security picture," he said.

The US is ramping up LNG exports to almost 130bn cubic metres a day (BCM) by the end of the decade, roughly equal to Russia's gas exports to Europe. This may rise to 200 BCM and possibly beyond as the shale industry keeps finding once unthinkable volumes of gas.

 
Natural gas spot prices

Mr Moniz said the world had been expecting the US to be a huge importer of LNG before the shale shock. The mere fact that this is no longer the case turns the market upside-down, and is a key reason why LNG prices have been in free-fall across the world.

The shift to net exports is something that almost nobody expected. Mr Moniz predicted that the US will match Qatar, and possibly exceed it to become the world's biggest exporter of LNG by 2020.

The US is still a net importer of natural gas but that is because Canadian pipelines supply New York and Detroit. However, it does not alter the overall picture.

Martin Houston, chairman of Parallax Energy, said the US may account for a quarter of the world's LNG market within a decade, and is so efficient that it can deliver gas to Europe for as little as $5 per million British thermal unit (Btu) despite the high cost of liquefa_ction and shipping.
 


The Americans are now in a race for leadership with Australia as its offshore Gorgon field cranks into gear, but the two countries feed different markets.

The US shipments are aimed directly at Europe, where there is a large and unused infrastructure of LNG terminals, including Lithuania's new "Independence" plant designed to end reliance on Russian pipelines. The mere prospect of American LNG deprives Russia of its pricing power and political leverage in Europe, spoiling its gas cash cow.

Just as US shale oil has turned global crude markets upside-down, LNG from shale is now doing the same to the gas markets - beaching countless projects around the world launched in the pre-shale era.

Alexander Medvedev, deputy chairman of Gazprom's management committee, made light of the US challenge. "There is room enough for all in this gas market. Europe needs another 70 BCM of gas by 2020," he said at the CERAWeek forum.
 


The COP21 climate accords in Paris have made gas an imperative, giving it a clear edge over coal as the fossil fuel of choice, since its CO2 emissions are half as much.

But Mr Medvedev hinted that Russia will fight back, warning that its gas deliveries will be "competitively priced".

Russia faces a dilemma. Gazprom can easily undercut LNG from the US, able to deliver gas for just $3.50. It has 100 BCM of idle capacity in west Siberia, according to the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (OIES).

James Henderson, a senior research fellow at the OIES, said it is tempting for Russia to "crater" the price until it falls below the break-even cost of shale frackers, much as Saudi Arabia is doing to oil frackers. “There may be some logic for Gazprom in adopting a Saudi-like strategy in order to reinforce its long-term competitive advantage,” he said.

Russian gas prices in Europe have already fallen so far - to $5.80 today from $11.20 in 2013 - that it may be worth the pain of pushing it a little lower to defend Moscow's 30pc share of the market.

The OIES said Gazprom could lose $25bn to $40bn in revenues over the next five years if it fails to act. The question is whether to strike a pre-emptive blow now while the first US cargoes are still modest. America's huge ramp-up occurs after 2018.

Bud Coote, a former chief energy analyst at the US Central Intelligence Agency and now a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, said the Kremlin may try to knock out America's LNG industry but that too would be very costly. "There's no question that the Russians could underprice LNG [but] it's hard to see them robbing themselves of so much revenue," he said.

HAS MICHAEL MANN BECOME A CLIMATE SCEPTIC?

This article provokes the question, as it looks at a new paper by Mann and others that actually prove that the pause in global warming is real. Amazing!

UK EU REFERENDUM - WILL IT STOP THE GREEN BLOB?

Everyone must be aware of the upcoming UK referendum on whether we remain in the EU or leave. This article looks at the issue from the perspective of legislation to decarbonise the UK. While it is true that the EU is way over the top on this issue, unfortunately the UK is even worse, so although I believe we should leave the EU in order to restore our sovereignty, I do not hold out much hope of a more sensible energy policy in the short term as both the main parties seem wedded to the global warming/climate change cult, but at least there may be a change in the future and we could vote for an alternative, whereas in the EU there is no possibility of getting a vote to change anything.

HEATHROW PROTESTORS GIVEN LIGHT SENTENCES

This article gives the details of the suspended sentences that were handed down to the thirteen protestors who disrupted passengers' travel for several hours causing chaos. Is it any wonder that we are getting more disruption with such derisory sentences being given. If they had to pay the full cost of their actions they might think twice before repeating them.

FRACKING CASE BEGINS TO UNRAVEL

Here are the details.  In a shocking admission that undermines much of the anti-fracking narrative pushed by environmentalists, a lawyer for plaintiffs suing an oil and gas company in Dimock, Pennsylvania has admitted the water in the area is not contaminated with fracking fluid. The truth will come out!

THERE IS NOT LIKEY TO BE ANY GLOBAL WARMING THIS CENTURY

That is according to Terence Mills, a professor of applied statistics at Louhgborough University in the UK.  This article gives a summary of his report, with a link to the full report for those who feel able to follow it. This is an interesting piece of work as it uses a different approach from the computer climate models which have been shown to produce rather unreliable predictions.

IS CLIMATE CHANGE SLIPPING DOWN THE AGENDA?

This article considers the reasons why this is happening so soon after the Paris agreement.  The main reason, I would suggest, is that our political masters know only too well how unpopular these policies are going to be, and so they put them on "the back burner" as much as possible. But don't imagine they have gone away for ever. There are still a large number of vested interests who will keep reminding our leaders that they must "do more to save the planet", and put out scary reports and stories to try to keep things going.

SOLAR ACTIVITY QUIETEST IN MORE THAN 100 YEARS

Daily Mail, 12 February 2016

Ellie Zolfagharifard
 

 

The sun is in the midst of its quietest period in more than a century. Several days ago, it was in ‘cue ball’ mode, with an incredible image from Nasa showing no large visible sunspots seen on its surface.

Astronomers say this isn’t unusual, and solar activity waxes and wanes in 11-year cycles, and we’re currently in Cycle 24, which began in 2008.

However, if the current trend continues, then the Earth could be headed for a ‘mini ice age’ researchers have warned.

We’ve had the smallest number of sunspots in this cycle since Cycle 14, which reached its maximum in February of 1906.

‘With no sunspots actively flaring, the sun’s X-ray output has flatlined,’ wrote Vencore Weather.

‘The number of nearly or completely spotless days should increase over the next few years as we continue to move away from the solar maximum phase of cycle 24 and approach the next solar minimum phase and the beginning of solar cycle 25.’

‘The current level of activity of solar cycle 24 seems close to that of solar cycle number 5, which occurred beginning in May 1798 and ending in December 1810,’ added an analysis by Watts Up With That.

The previous solar cycle, Solar Cycle 23, peaked in 2000-2002 with many furious solar storms.

During Solar Max, huge sunspots and intense solar flares are a daily occurrence. Auroras appear in Florida. Radiation storms knock out satellites.

The last such episode took place in the years around 2000-2001. [...]

The longest minimum on record, the Maunder Minimum of 1645-1715, lasted an incredible 70 years.

During this period, sunspots were rarely observed and the solar cycle seemed to have broken down completely.


Full story

This, they say, will lead to another ‘Maunder minimum’ – which has previously been known as a mini ice age when it hit between 1646 and 1715.

A study last year claimed to have cracked predicting solar cycles – and says that between 2020 and 2030 solar cycles will cancel each other out.

Many researchers are convinced that low solar activity, acting in concert with increased volcanism and possible changes in ocean current patterns, played a role in that 17th century cooling.

The period of quiet coincided with the Little Ice Age, a series of extraordinarily bitter winters in Earth’s northern hemisphere.

Maunder Minimum (also known as the prolonged sunspot minimum) is the name used for the period starting in about 1645 and continuing to about 1715 when sunspots became exceedingly rare, as noted by solar observers of the time

SEA LEVELS RISING SLOWER THAN EXPECTED, NASA SATELLITES DISCOVER

Daily Mail, 12 February 2016

Sarah Griffith
 Idyllic islands and bustling cities such as Venice and Miami may be spared from rising sea levels in the near future because parched land is absorbing some of the water released by melting glaciers.

The planet’s continents have soaked up and stored 3.2 trillion tons of water in soils, lakes and underground aquifers, according to Nasa. The agency analysed satellite measurements collected over the past decade to show the rate of sea level rise has slowed by 22 per cent – although the effect may be temporary.

‘We always assumed that people’s increased reliance on groundwater for irrigation and consumption was resulting in a net transfer of water from the land to the ocean,’ said lead author JT Reager of Nasa’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California.

‘What we didn’t realise until now is that over the past decade, changes in the global water cycle more than offset the losses that occurred from groundwater pumping, causing the land to act like a sponge – at least temporarily.’ 

The latest data came from a pair of Nasa satellites launched in 2002,
known as the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (Grace) illustrated

Between 2002 and 2014, it measured changes in gravity and therefore underlying changes in water storage.

The team of researchers, from Nasa’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the University of California, Irvine, University of Bonn, Germany, and National Taiwan University, combined the satellite data with estimates of mass loss of glaciers to calculate the impact land water storage might have had on sea level change.

Their analysis suggests that during this timeframe, climate variability resulted in an increase of approximately 3.2 trillion tons of water being stored in land.

The team learned that the ‘water gains over land were spread globally, but taken together they equal the volume of Lake Huron, the world’s seventh largest lake.

This gain partially offset water losses from ice sheets, glaciers, and groundwater pumping, slowing the rate of sea level rise by between 0.7 and 0.2 millimetres each year.’

They believe the findings, published in the journal Science, will help scientists better calculate sea level changes in the years ahead.

These results will lead to a refinement of global sea level budgets, such as those presented in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, which acknowledge the importance of climate-driven changes in hydrology, but have been unable to include any reliable estimate of their contribution to sea level changes,’ said senior author Jay Famiglietti, a professor at the University of California, Irvine. ‘But we’ll need a much longer data record to fully understand the underlying cause of the patterns and whether they will persist.’

NEW DECLARATION OF STUDENTS RIGHTS

A committee at the University of Chicago adopted a powerful declaration of student rights that has already been adopted by a number of colleges ready to break with the Political Correctness that is stifling free expression on campus.

Read it at CFACT.org and pass it on to others you may know attending college or working in a university setting.

This powerful document is certainly ruffling feathers and making an impact. It clearly lays out the case for a free debate of ideas, as can be seen in the following section:

"In a word, the University’s fundamental commitment is to the principle that debate or deliberation may not be suppressed because the ideas put forth are thought by some or even by most members of the University community to be offensive, unwise, immoral, or wrong-headed. It is for the individual members of the University community, not for the University as an institution, to make those judgments for themselves, and to act on those judgments not by seeking to suppress speech, but by openly and vigorously contesting the ideas that they oppose."

CFACT is getting behind this remarkable free speech statement and using our Collegians network to bring it to students, faculty, administrators, trustees and alumni everywhere.

We hope to see it adopted by student governments, Boards of Regents, and other entities where student expression is being crushed by the forces of Political Correctness. CFACT's Collegians are going to work by urging more institutions of higher learning to adopt a version of this remarkable declaration on free expression, or a similar version guaranteeing as powerful a protection of individual freedom or greater.

As the Chicago declaration also reminds us, “education should not be intended to make people comfortable, it is meant to make them think."

It's time to say " No!” to censorship. The only remedy for speech we disagree with is more speech; speech that persuades on the merits.

CFACT's students are uniquely positioned to champion the fight for free speech on campus.

Please forward a copy of the model declaration to educators wherever free speech is in jeopardy.

Our freedom is our most precious endangered resource.

We must either "use it, or lose it."

BRITAIN STRIKES BLACK GOLD: OIL FLOW FROM 'GATWICK GUSHER' EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

The Daily Telegraph, 16 February 2016

Jillian Ambrose

The Horse Hill site produced oil for the first time on Monday Photo: Reuters

Shares in UK Oil and Gas Investments soared by as much as 77pc after the Aim-listed developer announced that oil from its well near Gatwick Airport in Surrey flowed at a faster rate than expected.

UK Oil and Gas (Ukog) has claimed that oil from the so called "Gatwick gusher" at Horse Hill flowed from 900m below ground level to the surface without extra help from operators, and at a better rate than expected of 463 barrels a day.

The exploration company said the first ever flow test proves that “significant quantities” of Surrey oil can be brought to the surface “at excellent flow rates”.

"This is a very significant event for the company and for oil and gas activity in the Weald basin of southern England," said Stephen Sanderson, executive chairman of Ukog.

"Importantly, tests so far show oil has flowed to the surface under its own pressure and has not, so far, required artificial lift.

 
"The flow test, the first ever in the Lower Kimmeridge limestone within the Weald basin, provides proof that significant quantities of moveable oil exist within the Kimmeridge section of the well and can be brought to surface at excellent flow rates."

He said that while the flow rates were ahead of expectations, there was potential to increase them even further by using different techinques.

Ukog and its partners in Horse Hill have claimed that more than 9.2 billion barrels of oil lie under the 55 square kilometre licence area in the Weald Basin.

HUMOUR OUR MOST POWERFUL WEAPON

Humour is a devastating weapon and it is particularly effective when it taps into the truth. The new episode of Yes Prime Minister covers the global warming issue brilliantly (in the last ten minutes of the episode). here.  I fear that Jim Hacker is too close for comfort to our real political leaders, but we must laugh, if only to stop ourselves from crying!

GAS POWER v WIND POWER - COMPARE AND CONTRAST

There are some interesting data in this article from the excellent Scientific Alliance. They are comparing the cost and output of two new power plant projects, one using gas and the other wind power. The figures speak for themselves.

SEA LEVELS RISING SLOWER THAN PREDICTED SAYS NEW STUDY

Here is the article which explains that more water is being soaked up by the land which has become parched due to global warming. Whoever did the study has not looked around where I live which is so wet and boggy that it cannot absorb any more water. I guess it refers to the drier parts, but since there has been no measurable global warming they ought to look at other explanations. However the fact is that sea level rise is proceeding at the same gradual rate that it has been over the past century. Obviously much slower than alarmist predictions.

WELSH VILLAGE TO SUE THE GOVERNMENT OVER "BLIGHT" CAUSED BY SEA LEVEL RISE CLAIM

This report explains how a village has been blighted by a report on coastal sea protection which has claimed that sea level is set to rise by 100 cms in the next century (the headline in the Telegraph is even more misleading as it says a metre a year), meaning that low lying coastal areas will have to be abandoned to the sea. This is true alarmism, as nearby tide gauges show that sea level rise is likely to be no more than around 15cms per century.

PHYTOPLANKTON SUCK CO2 OUT OF THE AIR AND DUMP IT AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OCEAN

This article looks at the role of these tiny life forms and the way they act on CO2. Very interesting stuff, but once we start to try and alter the natural balance there is a danger of over doing it and reducing levels too much.

SUPREME COURT DEALS DECISIVE BLOW TO OBAMA'S EPA CLIMATE REGS

The U.S. Supreme Court has dealt a decisive blow to President Obama’s so-called EPA climate regulations.  The Court may have stopped the EPA cold with the EPA regulations unlikely to be implemented before Obama leaves office. This will give political leaders time to mobilize and ensure that the EPA ‘climate rules’ never see the light of day. Delay is nothing short of a victory.  This is a major victory for U.S. sovereignty, energy freedom, climate science and a blow to economic central planning.

Legally what comes next is further review at the appellate level.  Importantly, the Court retained the final word for itself by imposing its stay until it has a chance to rule on whatever the Court of Appeals decides.  This signals that the majority of the Court has severe doubts about the legality of what Obama and McCarthy tried to foist on us.

Let's hope the Supreme Court blocking Gina McCarthy from implementing this dirty "clean power plan" while President Obama is still in office buys time for cooler heads to return us to a constructive energy policy. See here for more details.

THE GREAT WOOD-BURNING MYTH

Here is an excellent and thorough article on the great myth that burning wood in power stations is saving CO2 emissions. It really is quite extraordinary that the politicians across Europe seem to be convinced otherwise. But as we have seen with the whole GW scare it is surprising how easy it is for politicians to succumb to group-think. It is not unlike the peer-pressure that school children feel, but on a much bigger scale.

NEW PAPER SAYS GW WILL AFFECT TRANSATLANTIC FLIGHT TIMES

Here is a discussion of the paper. It also gets a more detailed mention here where a slightly older paper comes to the opposite conclusion. This is the problem with GW, there is much confusion over the possible effects of a slightly warmer world. I guess it fills a few columns in the press if nothing else.

THE GOVERNMENT ARE TRYING TO HIDE THE COST OF CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES

This report explains what is going on. It is not surprising that DECC (Department of Energy and Climate Change) is trying to hide these figures. I hope that our MPs and other campaigners will use the Freedom of Information Act to keep them transparent.

EU TO TAKE OVER UK's ENERGY POLICY

From Philip Foster:

Old Sparky
Private Eye 1411

Keeping the Lights on

THE prime minister's protracted negotiations on curbing benefits for
EU immigrants may be grabbing all the attention, but an issue of much
greater magnitude is gathering momentum in Brussels and going
unnoticed by even the most rabid Eurosceptics.

The European Commission's (EC) quiet but relentless drive to create a
"European energy union" is a brazen power (sic) grab - in the same way
it controls agriculture under the common agricultural policy ˜ for the
one big area of policy that's still largely a national prerogative.
Technically speaking energy union is still only on the commission's
wish-list, but it is determined "to bring the ideas of the Energy
Union closer to the member states" - ie, railroad them through - as
was made clear in documents published before Christmas.

Though they pay careful lip-service to the status quo - "While it is
for member states to determine their energy mix and while it is a
sovereign decision of each member state on how to decarbonise its
economy..." - you know there is a pretty big "but" coming. Thus: "EU
level coordination of [energy] policies is necessary... EU-level
policies are the most effective; a strong and reliable governance
process is needed to guarantee such coordination... National plans
should therefore from the outset build on regional consultations...
The [European] Commission will actively engage in the process."

How does the commission aim to override member states' existing
rights? "Governance of the Energy Union policies will be tackled. This
is necessary in order to make sure that both planning and reporting
reflects the integrated approach of the Energy Union... Will the
Energy Union governance be anchored in [new] EU legislation? Yes."

In addition "the commission will carry out a fitness check of the
energy acquis*" - the "acquis" being the growing list of powers the EU
has acquired from national governments. It will surprise no one when
the "fitness check" concludes that the commission needs to grab some
more.

The energy union "idea", meanwhile, is being expanded even before it
has become reality. "Energy Union entails negotiating with one voice
with third countries", says one document, which helpfully offers a
"suggestion a Common External Energy Policy"! The fact that it has
already been capitalised indicates that it is more than a mere
suggestion.

There is no sign yet of anyone applying the brakes to this latest
euro-juggernaut - or of anyone even noticing what is happening.
_____

*Note
The 'acquis' [short for 'Acquis Communautaire'] is a fundamental part
of the Treaty of Rome whereby any powers taken by/surrendered to the
Commission CANNOT be returned to individual States under any
circumstances. A fact that Mr Cameron clearly has no understanding of.

MET OFFICE PREDICTS GW TO RESUME

Here is an interesting prediction by the UK Met Office. It is only a five year prediction, but that is good as it will be quicker to see if they are right. Watch this space!

GLOBAL WARMING CAUSING ANIMAL DEPRESSION SAYS "EXPERT"

This story from the Independent should have been saved for April 1st. I guess they couldn't wait. Actually these sort of stories are driving the average reader into the sceptic camp by making the global warming narrative into a laughing stock.

60% OF ELECTRICITY COSTS ARE NON-ENERGY RELATED

Reuters, 1 February 2016

Karolin Schaps and Susanna Twidale

British households will not benefit from a fall in market electricity prices because their suppliers are facing rising costs elsewhere, such as green energy subsidies, which they say cancel out any wholesale price falls.

Electricity and gas prices traded on the open market have fallen 20-35 percent in recent months as milder-than-normal weather has curbed demand and falling commodity prices have added even more downward pressure.

Two of Britain’s ‘Big Six’ energy suppliers, E.ON and SSE, have so far announced price cuts of around 5 percent to household gas tariffs, but reductions to electricity prices are notably absent.

“Many of the other costs that make up an electricity bill and that we don’t control have increased or may increase,” said a spokeswoman for E.ON UK, whose gas prices will fall 5.1 percent from Monday.

“These include electricity network costs – transmission and distribution – as well as environmental levies, such as the renewable obligation and FiTs (feed-in-tariffs).”

Cornwall Energy data showed the costs of government policies, which also include discounts for low-income households and payments for energy efficiency measures, on energy suppliers have risen to the highest level ever.

This means non-energy costs now make up as much as 60 percent of the average British electricity bill, up from 45 percent four years ago, according to Cornwall Energy data.

The main drivers here are the increasing costs to help finance building renewable energy plants, such as solar panels or wind farms.

Suppliers’ cost of the Renewable Obligation, the outgoing mechanism to distribute green energy subsidies, is 12.86 pounds per megawatt-hour, up from 10.57 pounds a year ago, Cornwall Energy said.

“These utilities are not selling electricity, they’re passing through renewable subsidies,” said Mark Freshney, utilities equity analyst at Credit Suisse.

COMPUTER CLIMATE "RESEARCH" INTO UK WET WINTER - GIGO*

*GIGO - for anyone not familiar with this acronym, it stands for Garbage in -Garbage out.
Here's another excellent piece debunking some so-called research. Paul Homewood certainly does his homework, unlike the people who published this piece of pseudo-science. How easily Paul is able to show how extreme rainfall events not only occurred in the past, long before CO2 increases could have had any effect, but they were actually more frequent then. QED!

  

ELECTRICITY COSTS - THE CONSUMER IS THE VICTIM OF "ADMINISTRATIVE PRICING"

This article explains what's happening to the electricity market in the UK, Germany and Denmark. As has been said before on this blog, it is a long way from a free market, and when markets are rigged they become very costly and they don't work. "Administrative pricing" is the phrase used by the author. In other words "rigged".

IOWA VOTES FOR THE MOST CLIMATE SCEPTIC REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE

This piece shows the result of the Iowa caucas. The winner was not the favourite, Donald Trump, but instead it went to Ted Cruze. Ted is well known for his sceptical views on global warming. He is a great speaker and maybe he could pull it off. Time will tell.

THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND ITS ABUSE

Here's a good piece looking at the dreaded Precautionary Principle and its misuse to thwart progress by those who seek to control us.

PREDICTIONS FOR 2040 - OIL USE TO GROW BY 25% AND GAS BY 50%

This post gives the full picture as predicted by Exxon. They say that coal will slip by around 6%, but renewables will be producing only a tiny 4%. I particularly noted this piece, Rex Tillerson, CEO of Exxon, told his shareholders in May last year, that ‘his firm hadn’t invested in renewable energy because “We choose not to lose money on purpose.” So there we have it - follow the money.