Tuesday, 30 June 2009

UK GOVERNMENT IN MASSIVE LEAFLET CAMPAIGN ON GW

The UK government is about to distribute millions of leaflets to schools and libraries warning of the "projected" dangers of global warming. Catastrophic floods and droughts caused by climate change could be prevented simply by putting less water in the kettle, it advises.
The details are in this report in the Telegraph. Some cynics are saying this is part of a massive propaganda exercise to soften up the public into accepting the huge costs to be imposed to implement a new agreement at the forthcoming Copenhagen conference.

REAL CLIMATE SCIENCE IGNORED IN FAVOUR OF CO2 RELIGION

This article in the Australian explains how potentially useful science is sidelined simply because it does not fit in with the paradigm of CO2 causing the climate to change.

Monday, 29 June 2009

EXPERT SCIENTIST SIDE-LINED FOR CLIMATE VIEWS

Here is yet another story about a leading scientists being shunned for expressing views contrary to the one perpetuated by the UN's IPCC body. It is even more evidence that not only are they intolerant of any other views, but they do their utmost to suppress those views. In doing so they actually do their cause no favours, as more and more people discover their behaviour and so question the whole issue more closely.

ECO TERRORISM ON THE INCREASE

We should all be concerned at these reports. The same thing is happening in the USA, with the support of climate alarmist scientist, James Hansen, it would appear. Only tough action by the police and the courts will be enough to make these lunatics think again.

Latest update - Hansen arrested!

Sunday, 28 June 2009

US CLIMATE BILL PASSES CONGRESS, JUST

Here is a link to the details, including a map showing where all the votes came from. Rebels on both sides meant that the result was far from clear-cut. Things may well go the other way in the all-important senate vote.

REAL CLIMATE DEBATE IN OZ AND USA

Politicians in Australia are having a real debate on the science of climate change. See this article for details. The reason for this is that, unlike in the UK, the politicians are very divided on the issue and so sceptics cannot be marginalised and ignored. Similar things are happening in the USA, as can be seen here.

It is in the USA and Australia that the whole emission trading business could finally hit the buffers - with any luck! This will leave the EU isolated and its governments facing an embarrassing u-turn.

PLOTS AND PROPAGANDA AT THE EPA

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reported to be in turmoil over its decision to declare CO2 a dangerous pollutant. This report explains what has been going on. You will not be surprised to learn of the way in which politics is taking precedence over science, as that is what is now happening in many nations. It is good to see the truth is emerging.

Saturday, 27 June 2009

JOB VACANCY

Get your CV's dusted off

Advertised in yesterday's Australian Financial Review:
-------------------------------------------------------

Department of Climate change:

Chief Advisor International $206,000 - $242,000

You will assist the First Assistant Secretary / Ambassador for Climate Change.

(Candidates must be able to obtain a security classification of "Top Secret" for this role !!!!!)

Also required are several positions paying $168,000 - $197,000



How much does the First Assistant Secretary / Ambassador for Climate Change earn? Unbelievable!!

UK ENERGY BILLS GO UP 23% IN A YEAR

The previous post was a prediction of the future, but this one is for the last year. Consumers are already close to their limit, so the government has got some serious thinking to do.

Friday, 26 June 2009

THE TRUE COST OF "GREEN" JOBS

Regular readers may recall the recent piece by the chairman of CSC. Here is an excellent article on EU Referendum which looks at the same issue of creating new "green" jobs to replace the traditional jobs which will become redundant as a result of extra taxes on CO2 emissions and other schemes like emission trading schemes. The problem with these government interventions is that it will be almost impossible to turn the clock back once the jobs are gone. This is not a trial. Western governments are carrying out a massive experiment using their people as guinea pigs.

MASSIVE RISE IN UK FUEL BILLS

This report in the Express gives the details. The question is - when will the people wake up to this and what will they do about it? Although some of the rise is due to increases in the cost of fossil fuels, much of it is directly caused by government and EU policies to reduce CO2 emissions. With a general election less than a year away what will the parties say about this? What is more important to them - pretending to save the planet, or getting elected?

Thursday, 25 June 2009

CLIMATE REALISTS FIGHT BACK IN USA

Across the Atlantic, in the USA, There is a real battle going on for the hearts and minds of the public. See this link to the Heartlands Institute. Sadly there is no organisation here in the UK to compare with the strong, well-funded Heartlands Institute. It is certainly time that there was. We have wealthy public-spirited people like Stuart Wheeler, but they act on their own. What is needed is someone like Stuart to set up an organisation in conjunction with others, or why not fund The Freedom Association which is already doing excellent work but lacks sufficient funding to do more?

Wednesday, 24 June 2009

STUDY SHOWS ANTARCTIC ICE SHELF STABLE

This article explains the study. Alarmists will be desparate to discredit this study. It will be interesting to see how they try to do it.

Tuesday, 23 June 2009

INDIA TO INCREASE COAL PRODUCTION, EU TO AGREE TO PAY FOR CLIMATE CHANGE

This article explains how the Indian government has set out its priorities. Clearly they have no intention of cutting back to "save the planet" - they are leaving that to the West, which means you and me and the rest of us paying thousands in a hopeless quest to control the climate. How many people will be willing to pay this - the government are not going to ask us, as they know the answer! But, be in no doubt, pay it we will, as you can see from this article. The politicians have already agreed the principle, it's just the details that have to be agreed. Perhaps if politicians had to pay more of the bill themselves, they wouldn't be quite so keen to give our money away. They might even start looking more closely at the science.

Monday, 22 June 2009

UK PROTESTORS FAIL TO HALT POWER PLANT

This article gives details of an attempt by green activists to shut down Kings North power station in Kent. This is the same power station that was involved in a court case in which, ludicrously, the protestors were cleared of causing criminal damage. This stupid decision must be responsible for the further damage that is being done.

EXCELLENT WEBSITE

SKEPTICS CORNER is agreat website with lots of good links and material. Well worth a look. I will add it to my list of links down the right hand side of the blog.

Sunday, 21 June 2009

INTERESTING LETTER TO POLITICIANS IN USA

This link takes you to a fact-packed letter written to a US representative about the latest Cap and Trade proposed legislation. It contains a lot of useful information.

Saturday, 20 June 2009

WISE WORDS FROM CARBON SENSE COALITION CHAIRMAN

“The RAT Scheme will destroy jobs, jobs, jobs.”

A statement/letter by Mr Viv Forbes, Chairman of the Carbon Sense Coalition.

13 June 2009

Any politician interested in preserving Australian jobs must vote against “The Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme”. It will not change the climate, it will do nothing useful for the planet and it will destroy real jobs faster than green jobs can be created.

This deceptively misnamed bill is not about “carbon” nor about “pollution reduction” – it is designed to Ration and Tax human production of carbon dioxide (CO2). It is correctly named “the Carbon Dioxide Ration and Tax Scheme” or “the RAT Scheme” for short.

There is no human activity or business that produces zero carbon dioxide – every activity (even sleeping on the job) produces CO2, either directly or indirectly. And for Australia’s chief industries, there is no feasible alternative on the horizon. Electricity generation, transport and tourism, agriculture and food processing, mining and mineral processing, infrastructure and construction, forestry and fishing, metals and cement, electronics and appliances – all depend for most of their energy on hydro-carbons – coal, oil and gas.

Even with a crash-through program of investment in alternative energy, the base load power will still be required, with boilers charged and staff on standby to cope with the many times when there is neither sun nor wind energy available. Given time and the political will, nuclear power could take up base-load power generation (at higher costs). But that looks unlikely to occur any time soon.

The first thing the RAT Scheme will do is establish a “cap” - a ration or limit on the production of CO2. (The exact level of the cap, and the base reference year will apparently be set using a roulette wheel in Penny Wong’s office.)

The whole purpose of the cap is to force Australia’s backbone industries to reduce production of CO2 (unless of course they are exempted, but that would make the whole exercise even more pointless and unfair than it is now). There are no real alternatives available in many applications (solar aircraft? wind powered trucks? geothermal fishing trawlers?) Thus the cap must thus reduce production.

This throttling of our key industries by way of Emission ration permits will cause the first round of job layoffs. Then comes the tax whammy.

Most industries will have to pay for their cap entitlement – ie they have to pay to do what they have previously been doing for free. Even after they have paid for production up to their rationed entitlement, any business which wishes to return to its pre-Rat scheme production levels (above the cap), must buy new ration permits in a speculative Emissions Permit market. This is another tax which has to be recovered from customers, other businesses or shareholders.

The first law of fiscal policy is this: “If you tax something, less of it will be produced.” This is the real aim of the RAT Scheme and it will achieve that aim.

There are always marginal businesses in all industries. An increase in taxes will cause a few of them to close their doors or move to a more enlightened country. And there are always nervous bankers ready to pull the plug because of the extra risk in the speculative carbon trading market.

In the green new world there is also no room for new projects or new jobs in traditional industries – any new project will need to force closure of an old project by buying its Ration permits on the market.

These new and uncertain taxes on existing production will cause the second round of job losses.

Even those businesses that survive the production cap, the ration fee and the excess carbon tax, will be forced to increase their prices to recoup the extra costs. This makes them less able to compete with imports in the Australian market, or with other exporters in the world market. Countries such as India, China, Brazil and South Africa, who have no intention of embracing the shackles of a RAT Scheme, will be the chief beneficiaries. Overseas is where the real new jobs will be created.

This unfair competition from foreign firms will cause the third round of jobs layoffs.

To date we have only looked at things from the perspective of existing industry.

There is also a whole gamut of global warming policies that will directly or indirectly subsidize regulators, inspectors, auditors, lawyers, bankers, carbon traders, international conferences, and the manufacture and operation of subsidised facilities such as wind farms, solar arrays, carbon forests and facilities granted exemptions from the costs everyone else must bear.

The second law of fiscal policy is this: “If you subsidise something, you will get more of it”.

We will thus get more of these costly subsidised things – the Climate Change Industry looks like becoming the biggest industry in the world. It will compete with real industry for materials, labour and rationed energy, but will not put cheaper food on our plate, cheaper or more reliable electricity into the grid or make a net contribution to tax revenue.

The growing costs of the Climate Change Industry must filter back to the real economy, causing more job layoffs.

Three places in the world have already tested the Green Job Creation Myth – Spain and Denmark with massive wind and solar power developments and California which tries to lead the world in everything green.

All three have seen loss of jobs as industries close or relocate because of costly or unreliable electricity supply. A recent study in Spain has concluded that more than 2 real jobs were destroyed for every green job created. In addition Spain has 17% unemployment, electricity shortages, and power costs up by from 30% (homes) to 100% (businesses). Denmark is selling unreliable wind power at a loss, and California’s climate madness has caused a huge loss of jobs and tax revenue.

Surely Australia can learn from the mistakes of others and refuse to pass this dangerous legislation.

Ends. 970 words.

For more information on Green Job destruction in Spain see:this link

Viv Forbes Chairman

The Carbon Sense Coalition

MS 23 Rosewood Qld Australia 4340

0754 640 533 info@carbon-sense.com

Friday, 19 June 2009

POLITICIANS MEET WITH OPPOSING CLIMATE SCIENTISTS IN OZ

Read the details of this meeting here on Jo Nova's blog. It may not change hearts, let alone minds, but at least there was a meeting at which opposing views were put. On reading the account, one thing seemed to emerge, and that is that the alarmists do not want to discuss the science - I wonder why???

BA CHIEF PROPOSES WORLD WIDE FLIGHT TAX

British Airways Chief Executive, Willie Walsh, has proposed a carbon tax on all flights world wide. This is a very noble gesture on his part, with the passengers picking up the unquantified bill. On the other hand he could be accused of gesture politics, as it seems unlikely that any world wide agreement is going to be reached. Typical of so many of our company chiefs today, trying to appear "green", while hoping it won't happen. The trouble with this policy is that it enhances the whole global warming nonsense ever further making it more difficult to make the alternative case that global warming is nothing to do with CO2. Read the report here.

Thursday, 18 June 2009

BBC FAILS TO SCRUTINISE MINISTER ON CLIMATE DATA

Just listen to this feeble effort (scroll down to 8.15) at challenging the UK climate minister, Hilary Benn, on the new detailed forecasts of climate change for the UK over the next century. No mention whatsoever of the fact that these forecasts are made using computer climate models which have failed to predict the recent nine years of decline in average world temperatures, or of their failure to predict that the atmosphere would fail to warm more than the surface temperature. The failure of the BBC to probe these so-called predictions is lamentable, as well as being a dereliction of their duty.

At least there is more of an attempt to scrutinise this in Australia, see this link to read about a politician doing some investigations of his own.

UK CLIMATE PROPAGANDA TO BRAINWASH LOCAL GOVERNMENT

This is the latest event to ensure that local government remains "on message" regarding the global warming solution. No mention here of the facts; like the warming has ceased and the globe has been cooling for nine years. No mention of anything "inconvenient". Government can never be wrong can it?

Wednesday, 17 June 2009

THIS BLOG CLEARED - "IT'S NOT SPAM"

Readers will be pleased to note that the blog has been given the all-clear following being reported by someone as being a "spam blog". Maybe an alarmist has been playing games.

IPCC WRONG ABOUT MEDIEVAL WARM PERIOD - NEW RESEARCH

This new research shows that the last IPCC report was wrong to conclude that evidence shows that the medieval warm period was not consistent over the globe. The new report says the evidence produced by the IPCC is not reliable. Further it says that if the Medieval Warm Period was real and must have occurred naturally, then the argument that the recent warming is man-made is also not reliable and scientists must admit that it could also be natural in origin. Yet another nail in the coffin of the alarmists.

Tuesday, 16 June 2009

"CHINA DOESN'T GIVE A STUFF ABOUT GW"

This article by James Delingpole sums up China's position in a nutshell - and the pathetic position of the West as a consequence.

Monday, 15 June 2009

MET OFFICE TO GIVE DETAILED FORECAST FOR REST OF THE CENTURY

Yes, it's true, the people who have difficulty predicting the weather for the next week are going to give the UK a detailed breakdown of the way they believe the climate is going to change over the next century, according to this report in the Telegraph.

Why are they doing this? One explanation is given in this quote by a spokesman, "Ordinary people will be able to see how critical climate change is..... It will hammer it home." (That is if they believe the forecasts, and also they believe the climate changes can be prevented by cutting CO2.)

Since the real climate is not giving us any evidence of catastrophic change, the alarmists are resorting to predictions in the vain hope that we will find these scary enough to make us support the government's very costly measures to cut CO2.

ARCTIC SEA ICE EXTENT NOW NORMAL!

This article from Jennifer Marohasy explains the facts. Just remember this when you see the next scare story on the main TV news.

Sunday, 14 June 2009

THIS BLOG UNDER ATTACK?

Today on going into my blog to make a new post I found this notice:

"This blog has been locked due to possible Blogger Terms of Service violations. You may not publish new posts until your blog is reviewed and unlocked.

This blog will be deleted within 20 days unless you request a review."

I was then presented with one of those distorted writings to decipher, which I did and as you can see my post still came up. I have requested a review and hope all will be well. If the blog disappears, then readers will know the reason. I hope this is just a glitch and not an attack by climate alarmists.

AND BACK IN THE REAL WORLD........

This week's Booker Column explains how the recent downturn in temperatures has lead to a reduction in food production. While politicians throw billions at a non-problem the only too real problems are being ignored, or even made worse.

US CLIMATE SCEPTIC CONFERENCE

This report gives details of the latest Heartland Institute Climate Conference held in Washington. While this apparently receives limited media coverage, at least it is something. Here in the UK such conferences just don't happen. To read more on the conference go to this link.

Saturday, 13 June 2009

POLITICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE

Here is an excellent article by Benny Peiser which spells out exactly what is the likely outcome of the impending global warming talks. Meanwhile the costly and totally pointless measures taken by western governments to try to affect the climate will continue to damage our economies.

Friday, 12 June 2009

TALK ACTION - PROPAGANDA TRAINING

Here is a link to an organisation called "Talk Action". I get regularly bombarded with emails from them, as presumably other councillors do. Yet another example of the money being made out of global warming. As more people are taught to pass on the propaganda, this in turn should indoctrinate more to the belief, and so on. Compare all this with the tiny amount being done to put forward any contrary views and you can see why governments are still clinging to the policy of cutting CO2 emissions, although they are desparate not to do anything to adversely affect their economy. The biggest problem for Talk Action and all the other hangers on is the refusal of our weather to play ball and conform to the predictions of the alarmists.

Thursday, 11 June 2009

DAVID ARCHIBALD VIDEOS - WHY THE CLIMATE MODELS ARE WRONG

The song says "a picture paints a thousand words", so it is good to view a video instead of reading an article occasionally. Here is a good one to try.

Wednesday, 10 June 2009

MORE PROPAGANDA AND DECEIT?

BBC radio programme Costing the Earth was recently broadcast claiming that the Cartaret Islands were being submerged by rising sea levels. This claim just does not fit the evidence, however. While there is no doubt that the islands are suffering by inundations of sea water, the reason for this is because the islands are SINKING as they sit on top of a subduction zone. Sea level monitoring records on either side of the islands show clearly that there has been no rise in sea level.

Tuesday, 9 June 2009

AUSSIE SENATOR APPROACHES GW WITH OPEN MIND!

Yes - a politician who actually looks at all the facts and then makes up his own mind on an issue! This article in the Australian Telegraph gives the details. Such politicians are so rare they are almost extinct, so let's hope he encourages a few others to open their eyes before it's too late.

WEATHER ROUND UP

This excellent round up on EU Referendum Blog reinforces the current downturn in temperatures; well worth a read.

GREEN KILL JOYS SHOW THEIR TRUE COLOURS

Here is an interesting story from The Australian in which you see that hardline greens want to do away with democracy in order to "save the planet". A very sinister development.

Monday, 8 June 2009

CANADA COOLING TO EMISSION CONTROLS

This article explains that Canada is now not going to act before the USA in controlling emissions of CO2. Of course not - why should they export their industry and give themselves grief.

Sunday, 7 June 2009

A TALE OF TWO PLANETS - CHRISTOPHER BOOKER

Here is the latest column by Christopher Booker in which he explains the divergence between the real world and the one inhabited by those determined to forge ahead with new tough measures to "save the planet". Excellent stuff by Christopher who, almost alone, keeps readers of the Telegraph aware of what is happening in our name.

CAN YOU TRUST A SCIENTIST?

Further to an earlier post and after the recent revelations about MP's expenses, the question is - who can you trust? This article puts the spotlight on scientists with serious doubts emerging about their trustworthyness. The answer is that we should not give any group unquestioning trust. We must be sceptical of everything controversial and ask for evidence. If (like Michael Mann of Hockey-stick infamy!) they refuse to publish all their data then we must conclude that their results are not to be trusted at all.

Saturday, 6 June 2009

GUESSWORK, EXAGGERATION,DECEIT AND LIES

On this site I have referred many times to the propaganda war that is going on to convince the populace that global warming is a catastrophic threat. This article examines the recent Global Humanitarian Forum report with contributions by the World Health Organisation into the number of deaths worldwide caused by global warming. The article is by Prof. Roger Pielke Jr. and he exposes the report for what it is - guesswork, exaggeration,deceit and lies. It beggars belief that any organisation that wants to be taken seriously could produce such blatant propaganda, and even worse that journalists and politicians would give such a report any credence whatsoever.

For a summary see this article in the Wall Street Journal.

Friday, 5 June 2009

PROF IAN PLIMER INTERVIEW

This interview with the foremost Australian geologist is well worth watching. Here is someone who is pre-eminent in his field who really should know what he is talking about and he is in no doubt.

Thursday, 4 June 2009

CHINESE WHINGE AT "MEAN" USA ON GW

The Chinese government were obviously looking forward to receiving massive aid from the USA to help it cope with "climate change", but it is beginning to look as though Obama is not quite such a soft touch as they thought, as this article explains.

Wednesday, 3 June 2009

EU GETTING COLD FEET OVER EMISSIONS CUT COSTS

This article explains how the reality of what the EU emission reduction policy for European industry has begun to dawn on those responsible. Once the job losses start to gather pace there will be no where for them to hide.

Tuesday, 2 June 2009

UKRAINE TO SELL HOT AIR INDULGENCES TO WEST

If you think carbon trading schemes are still in the future, this article will lead you to realise that they are already up and running, and costing billions of pounds. Ultimately it is you and I that will be paying for it.

Monday, 1 June 2009

NEW MEANING TO "GLOBAL WARMING"?

Did you wonder what happens at all these "climate change" conferences? This article gives us a glimpse. It simply shows the true agenda of delegates to conferences; under all the hot air they have feet of clay. This is one international trade that is exempt from all the carbon footprint nonsense.