Wednesday, 17 June 2009


This new research shows that the last IPCC report was wrong to conclude that evidence shows that the medieval warm period was not consistent over the globe. The new report says the evidence produced by the IPCC is not reliable. Further it says that if the Medieval Warm Period was real and must have occurred naturally, then the argument that the recent warming is man-made is also not reliable and scientists must admit that it could also be natural in origin. Yet another nail in the coffin of the alarmists.


  1. I don't have anything specific to address regarding your post but I just finished reading the summary report of an 800+ page report done by the NIPCC that challenges the assertions of the IPCC. Its called Climate Change Reconsidered. You can read it all online or buy it on Amazon(it aint cheap). I think it should be included in your Essential Reading if only as a reference link. It should be a skeptic's bible. Something to refer back to when one needs anwers. (LINK)

  2. Thanks for the information. I have added the link as you suggest. It is a very comprehensive document and well worth reading.

  3. The Medieval Warm Period is real and I believe that we are in it. This warming period happen before in 1000 and ended in 1300. So that mean in 2000 that when the Medieval Warm Period started up again. It probably why the glacier are melting faster. I beleive this could cause our hurricane season in Atlantic to become more severe. 2005 hurricane season was bad than any other years and centuries as well. Between the Medieval Warming and Global Warming I believe that our climate is going to get hotter and hotter each year and centuries.


Climate Science welcomes your views/messages.