This case was decided back in 2007 and yet it appears, so far, not to have led to any significant change. Here is an article explaining the decision with links to more detail for those of a legal disposition. Readers of this blog will be aware that the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) seems to be very pro-active in recent years to control power station emissions, so it seems strange that it defended this case at all. However it did not appear to do a very good job. I wonder if the new president will do anything to rein in the EPA?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Climate Science welcomes your views/messages.