Could it be because they know that it is actually lower than the cost of their policies to reduce CO2 emissions? That is the conclusion of this report which looks at the sums, including those carried out by the US Environmental Protection Agency.
If it is true that the costs outweigh the benefits then surely the public should be told?
If it is true that the costs outweigh the benefits then surely the public should be told?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Climate Science welcomes your views/messages.