A good new video by Paul Burgess
Proving That CO2 Does NOT Control The Climate in Five Minutes
This site is a reference point for those with a cool head for climate science, arguably the most political science ever. When the government and most of the media concentrate on alarmism, this site is the antidote for those who don't believe the scare stories - YOU ARE NOT ALONE! (blog started on 7/11/07) We have over 3 million hits and blog is updated regularly most days.
This is a seismic U-turn, one that should take the oil giant firmly away from its fancy Beyond Petroleum slogans and even more fanciful attempts to become a renewables group.
Five years ago, BP set some of the most absurd targets among its peers to cut production of oil and gas by 40 per cent by 2030, while ramping up investment in renewables.
Now Auchincloss is doing the reverse: looking to increase investments in fossil fuels by 20 per cent to £8billion by 2027 while cutting spending on renewables to around £1.2billion a year, more than £4billion less than planned.
SINGAPORE, Feb 13 (Reuters) – China started construction on 94.5 gigawatts of coal-fired power in 2024, the highest volume of new builds since 2015, hampering the country’s transition away from fossil fuels, researchers said
China is so committed to Net Zero last year it started building 95 Gigawatts of coal plants « JoNova
"It is beyond doubt that if we continue on the Net Zero path we will return to the long-term upwards trend until the economy and/or society melt down entirely."
It is now becoming clear that altering the temperature records is something which is widespread among those nations which are heavily invested in the climate crisis narrative and net zero CO2 emissions targets. The surprising thing is that no one seems willing or able to call them to account.
Tampering With Temperature Records In Netherlands | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
Trump in his second term has learnt a lot on how to get things done in a hurry. Just read what he has achieved already and then imagine what he will achieve in four years! If he succeeds the USA will power ahead and the Republicans could remain in power for decades.
Trump is unravelling the Climate Blob at full speed « JoNova
Here is further evidence of a clear shift in policy on net zero. It is still only a partial retreat, but either you have a net zero by 2050 policy or you don't. Once the mask has slipped there is no going back. They can see the mess the government is getting into and so they are slowly distancing themselves.
The Tories set the UK net zero target. Now they are dumping it – POLITICO
In his latest short video Paul Burgess suggests posing a simple question to a climate alarmist as in this 2 minute video. He says to point out to them what effect all the measures have had on the level of CO2 emissions world-wide over the past 20 years and showing a graph which indicates no effect at all apart from the major recessions and covid. He makes a very good point, but the alarmist will, of course come back with "but we have got to do far more", and then reel off the extreme weather events which they claim to be linked to climate change. Arguing with a climate alarmist is a bit like arguing with a Jehovah's Witness - it;s very time consuming and you don't get anywhere!
(1) The Simplest Response to A Climate Alarmist - in 2 minutes - YouTube
Trump’s reversals of the Biden administration’s “all-of-government” policy agenda focused on “combatting climate change” and “environmental justice" and replace it with a new policy to set free America’s capacity for capitalist growth and human flourishing.
Trump's energy agenda: beware of government overreach - Clintel
The findings may seem counterintuitive, but frequent low-lying surface fires often maintain balance in forests by reducing fuel sources across large areas, says Phys.org. They show modern-day fires are much less frequent than they were in past centuries, despite recent record-breaking fire years, such as 2020. The results also reveal that much of the continent is in a substantial “fire deficit,” experiencing about 20% as much fire as in the past. Read more details here:
That is the title of this short video by Sabine Hossenfelder, who produces science videos and has a large following. In this video she looks at how the big institutions and companies have backed out of costly pledges. All this was predictable. Fortunately the evidence suggests that the effect of CO2 has been shown to be much less than alarmists were predicting. At the end of the video she mentions a wildlife charity which does good work to try and help to save endangered species. Something that most people would agree is worthwhile. Definitely worth watching, though I find her German accent a bit off-putting.
Everyone is Giving Up On Climate Goals - Except the UK Labour government!
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of the UK parliament is a powerful body which looks at whether the government is getting good value for money on various projects. This new report does not make good reading for the government.
PAC Slam Miliband’s Carbon Capture Plans | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
Considering that the world is supposed to be facing a "climate crisis" it does seem odd that so many of the political leaders have not even made a new climate target, unless they don't really believe there is one. The UK are the class swots and are one of the few to hand their homework in on time - but will they keep their promises or are they just empty words?
Nations are struggling to increase CO2 emission cuts and so are promising smaller cuts. This is only to be expected as these cuts are starting to hurt the economy and be felt in people's pockets.
New Zealand plans to barely cut emissions between 2030 and 2035
This short video looks at the fall in the share price of a number of wind farm manufacturing companies. Why is this happening?
Will this production calm the fears of vulnerable teenagers who have become totally brainwashed by the constant propaganda?
Bringing the Outside In | Mayflower Below is part of the intro:
"Amber is alone. She’s not turned up for the first day of her final year of sixth form. She’s terrified of the climate crisis, and everyone knows it. Enter Yerna – a three thousand year old “giant” she accidentally summons, who turns her stuffy flat into a forest oasis!.
Of course they don't give away the whole story, but perhaps it might end something like this:
Suddenly Yerna emerges from behind a plant pot along with a whole mass of greenery. "Where has all this come from?" asks Amber.
Yerna explains, "You see the plants are my friends and they love CO2 and warmth, so your flat was just right for them. The CO2 levels in here are much higher than outside. That is why they pump CO2 into greenhouses".
Amber looked surprised. "But I thought CO2 was bad and that we were all going to die?"
Yerna spoke quietly and calmly, "I am 3000 years old and that is not true. The climate is a bit warmer, about 1.5 degrees C. It was just as warm during the Medieval Warm Period, around 1000 years ago. It was a really good time, just like the Roman Optimum about 2000 years ago. The worst climate was the Little Ice Age which only ended in about 1850. Just think, if we hadn't warmed up by that 1.5 degrees C. we would still be in it today!"
Amber smiled and gave a sigh of relief. "I am so glad you came", she said. "Now I know the truth I will go back to college and tell all my friends".
Amber took a load of selfies with Yerma and put them on Facebook with a short video of Yerma explaining things which soon went viral. After that she became a massive celebrity and President Trump invited her to the White House where she explained what had happened to the American public.
Satellites show that global temperatures have been in freefall in recent months. Since September 2024, they have fallen by a full half a degree Celsius, and yet the BBC claims that last month was the world’s warmest January on record. So what is going on?
Hottest January? Latest BBC Lies! | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
UPDATE:
See from the chart in this link that January 2024 global temperature anomaly is 0.80 degrees C. compared with the anomaly for January 2025 which is 0.46 degrees C.
UAH v6.1 Global Temperature Update for December, 2024: +0.62 deg. C « Roy Spencer, PhD
It is refreshing to see scientists admit that they cannot explain some things. So often they bluster and pretend they have all the answers.
The EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) deals with pollution in the USA and exceeded its powers by claiming that CO2 was a pollutant and was a danger to health. This then allowed it to bring in a whole raft of controls without needing the government to pass any legislation. If Trump is able to overturn this then a huge raft of legislation will fall away. The article below explains how it could be done:
How To Rescind The Endangerment Finding In A Way That Will Stick — Manhattan Contrarian
How is the Trump administration doing in its efforts to remove and replace all the pro-climate change propaganda on USA government websites? It has been a good start but there is still a lot to do according to this article;
It's Time To Purge The Climate Scam From The Federal Websites — Manhattan Contrarian
A short while ago a researcher, Ray Sanders, reported on some very poor practices going on at the UK Met Office. This received a lot of coverage in the online climate science blogs and also the online news outlet, the Daily Sceptic. Clearly this has come to the attention of the Met Office, which has led to an attempt to rebut some of the claims. The unconvincing rebuttal has only led to another long article pointing out the feebleness of the defence put forward, which is about as convincing as a burglar caught leaving the premises with a bag full of loot.
Can the policy of expanding airports be compatible with the UKs new pledge on CO2 reductions? This article explains:
Miliband vows to halve UK emissions days after Reeves backs Heathrow third runway
In this informative video we learn how we are being deceived by government spin, and what the true picture in terms of how the government's policy is going to affect us all.
It seems that scientists frequently associate their work with climate change in order to get publicity, however tenuous the link. In this example you can see that they have stretched credulity to the limit. These allegations only serve to make people more sceptical of the whole issue.
Climate change could spark outbreaks of DIARRHOEA in Britain, scientists warn | Daily Mail Online
This video explains what is coming for those who purchased EVs a few years back and are about to try and sell them. This is what happens when the government tries to control the market.
An EV depreciation TIME BOMB is heading for finance companies | MGUY Australia
Solar energy can be very useful in countries which have a sunny climate, but for the UK they have only a limited use as there is not enough storage to cover the long periods when there is no sun, or very limited sun. This video explains more:
The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, wants to grow the economy, whereas the Climate Change Minister wants to get to net zero. What they need to understand is that to achieve anything close to net zero you have to sacrifice growth, which means you will lose the next election.
Rachel Reeves hints at support for Heathrow third runway - BBC News
The endangerment finding is the linchpin of much of the EPA’s climate-related regulatory authority. Issued during the Obama administration, this finding declared greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide as pollutants that endanger public health and welfare. By initiating this review, President Trump has taken the first step toward unraveling the faulty rationale that has fueled countless overzealous climate policies.
The radical "Climate and Nature" bill has failed to clear its first hurdle in the House of Commons. It is now unlikely to become law. So we can all breathe a sigh of relief that even this government is not mad enough to commit economic suicide at the rate that this bill would have achieved. However the current net zero is just a slower version along similar lines as we will find out in the next few years.
Climate and Nature Bill falls as MPs vote to end debate - BBC News
It is worth mentioning that, if what is constantly being fed to the public about there being a climate emergency due to man made CO2 is true, then all these privations would be necessary. Luckily the scientific evidence does not support what is being fed to us and I suspect a lot of our leaders know this but dare not admit it as they know it would immediately make them look very foolish. On the other hand if there are some who actually believe it, they know that they dare not implement such a drastic policy as they know it would destroy the economy.
The result is that we carry on with a policy which is still very costly and damaging, while at the same time will not achieve its intended goal. Not only that, but unless all major countries implemented the same stringent policy it could not possibly work.
When this period of human history is written, future generations will be amazed at the huge fuss that was made of what might be called the "climate issue", just as today we look back at the "witchcraft issue".
Net zero is a mad aim as it currently is being followed by the UK government, but for those of a puritanical nature there is an even madder version set out in a back-bench MPs bill. If this were to passinto law here's what it would lead to:
Here is a new short video on the Antarctic ice:
Real Climate Science | "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
Excellent news that Lord Frost has made this decision. He has long been a critic of the UK’s current energy policy, and his appointment reflects the importance that he ascribes to this issue. He will not be remunerated for this role.
Here in this linked 40 minute video there is an in-depth discussion about the UK electricity supply system. It focuses on the effect of wind and solar energy on the reliability of it, and the risk of blackouts as we approach 2030 when the Labour government have set out to make the supply net zero CO2 emissions. This should be essential listening for the government, as well as all voters!
Will blackouts come to Britain?
UPDATE
More on this from Paul Burgess
This has been admitted by Ed Miliband, the Labour minister in charge of the UK energy system and net zero. I think he should have said "WILL" rather than "may". Despite this, the government are still planning to introduce a scheme which will come into force in April, whereby boiler manufacturers will be fined if they fail to sell enough heat pumps.
Companies in the sector have previously warned it would add £120 to the cost of a new boiler – leading it to be dubbed the 'boiler tax'.
Ed Miliband admits heat pumps may NEVER be cheaper than gas boilers
The Climate and Nature Bill sounds innocuous enough, in fact it is a wolf in sheep's clothing as this article reveals. However before we start to man the barricades it must be noted that this is a back-bench bill that is not supported by the government so it is highly unlikely to pass into law, which is just as well!
Net Zero Watch welcomes the admission by Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch that the 2050 decarbonisation target was ‘a mistake’ and that it was put in place without any plan to deliver it.
This new position will undoubtedly lead to speculation that the party is about to adopt a radically different climate and energy policy.
In the Atlantic Ocean, a system of connected currents, called the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) often referred to as the Gulf Stream, moves water throughout the world’s oceans powered by a combination of winds and ocean density. As the climate is continuously changing and the atmosphere is warming, many scientists fear that fresh water from melting polar ice sheets could significantly disrupt—or collapse—the AMOC. While a decline of the AMOC would have grave consequences, a collapse would be truly catastrophic.
In a new paper published in Nature Communications, scientists found that the AMOC has not declined in the last 60 years.
for more than eight years, the climate scientist Michael Mann harassed National Review through litigation over a blog post — until, eventually, the First Amendment brought an end to his attack. This week, a court in our nation’s capital ordered Mann to pay us $530,820.21 worth of attorney’s fees and costs, and to do so within 30 days. It is time for him to get out his checkbook, and sign on the dotted line.
Court Orders Michael Mann to Pay National Review Attorney's Fees and Costs | National Review
This time it is from the USA where melting glaciers in the Rockies have revealed the existence of 7000 year old forests. Similar findings in the Alps show that this was a widespread phenomena.
7000 Year Old Trees Uncovered High Up In The Rockies | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
Bloomberg) — President-elect Donald Trump said Tuesday he would seek to have a policy of having no wind farms constructed during his second term, threatening billions of dollars in planned wind projects.
“We are going to have a policy where no windmills are being built,” Trump said during a lengthy tirade against wind power during a press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.
Trump, who has vowed a first day executive order targeting wind farms, has long made no secret his disdain for the energy source. But his remarks Tuesday represented the sharpest threat yet from the incoming president.
The race to Not Zero: the beginning of the end of the climate delusion picks up speed… « JoNova
The German energy transition, initiated in 2000 by the EEG (Renewable Energy Sources Act), is celebrating its 25th anniversary this year. This is a good time to look at the intention, logic and results of this gigantic national project.
Twenty-five years of German energy transition: a way not to go - Clintel
Acknowledged leading physicists, Drs. van Wijngaarden and Happer, have produced the evidence in a new paper. Since CO2 has only risen by 50% since 1750 (280 ppm to 420 ppm), CO2’s total greenhouse effect influence in reducing outgoing radiation has thus far been in the range of tenths of a percentage point. A less than 1% change in outgoing radiation over hundreds of years is not even detectable amid the noise of outgoing radiation measurement. Observation error in measuring Earth’s outgoing radiation is 33 W/m², for example.
Physicists: Increasing CO2 By 100% Only Reduces Radiative Cooling To Space By An Imperceptible 1%
That is the only way to keep the lights on. At last people are waking up to the truth.
Jon Keeley, a scientist working for the US Geological Survey, says “I don’t think these fires are the result of climate change. You certainly could get these events without climate change.”
Keeley has been studying the connection between various climaltic conditions and fires for the past forty years. He correctly pointed out that the conditions causing this type of fire have existed for thousands of years in this part of California.
Scientists At Loggerheads Over Cause Of Wildfires Ravaging California - Climate Change Dispatch
But was the damage a result of poor government decisions?
That is not a headline that immediately grabs your attention, but it is actually true. It will probably disappoint those who like to strike fear of climate change into the mind of the public so that they readily accept the massive costs they are about to be burdened with to control the climate back to what it was in the good old days before we had central heating motor cars and aircraft. Of course this will not be reported in our mainstream media.
Before he has even taken up office there has been a sea change in the banking world regarding net zero. This looks like something that will make a big difference. I wonder how long it will be before the UK Labour government has to also change course?
The last American Banker rats are leaving the UN Net Zero Banking club « JoNova
Have a look at the costs, due to the unreliable nature of renewable energy. We used to power ships with wind, and there was a reason why we stopped in favour of diesel engines. A lesson for the government.
The UK Met Office must be getting worried that it is facing scrutiny that is long overdue. It is desperately trying to discredit the criticism of its weather stations and the data they produce. Unfortunately for them the cover-up is only making matters worse. They would be far better off admitting their mistakes and putting things right, but, just like the Post Office, that is the last thing they want to do. Read the latest report here:
A recent paper by Helge F. Goessling, et al., published by AAAS Science, looks at the possible cause of the recent global temperature surge and suggests it has been intensified by record-low planetary albedo”. The abstract states:
“In 2023, the global mean temperature soared to almost 1.5K above the pre-industrial level, surpassing the previous record by about 0.17K. Previous best-guess estimates of known drivers including anthropogenic warming and the El Niño onset fall short by about 0.2K in explaining the temperature rise. Utilizing satellite and reanalysis data, we identify a record-low planetary albedo as the primary factor bridging this gap. The decline is apparently caused largely by a reduced low-cloud cover in the northern mid-latitudes and tropics, in continuation of a multi-annual trend. Further exploring the low-cloud trend and understanding how much of it is due to internal variability, reduced aerosol concentrations, or a possibly emerging low-cloud feedback will be crucial for assessing the current and expected future warming.”
Previous papers have pointed out a warming of the oceans, particularly in the tropics. Since infrared radiation (from greenhouse gases such as CO2) cannot penetrate the ocean surfaces beyond a few millimeters (small fractions of an inch) increasing atmospheric CO2 cannot be an explanation of ocean warming over a few years, but increased sunlight at sea level can.
This is a new video by Paul Burgess which covers a range of topics looking at the reasons why net zero is a totally impractical proposition. It is much longer than his normal videos at over two hours, but it is in sections that can be seen separately. It is a very professional product and well worth watching.
Exposing The Net Zero Agenda - A Documentary by Paul Burgess
Just look at the latest figures for subsidising wind and biomass energy. A record high of £2.36 billion for last year. Meanwhile subsidies for wind power via the Renewable Obligation Scheme cost a further £4.6 billion in the year ended March 2024. In short, wind power is now being subsidised to the tune of about £7 billion a year, when constraint payments are included.
CfD Subsidies Hit Record High In 2024 | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
Here is a summary of an article written in a Report in 1974:
Annual average temperatures over the Northern Hemisphere increased rather dramatically from 1890 to 1940, but have been falling ever since. The total change (by1974) has averaged about 0.5 degrees Centigrade, with the greatest cooling in higher latitudes. Iceland's hay crop has dropped by 25% since the 1950's, while pack ice in waters around Iceland and Greenland ports is becoming the hazard to navigation it was in the 17th and 18th centuries.
From 1890 to 1940 man enjoyed the warmest climate the world had known for 5 or 6 centuries. Dr. Reid Bryson, Director of the University of Wisconsin's Institute for Environmental Studies, thinks that the relatively warm period from 1890 to 1940 was only a brief intermission in the Little Ice age, a perid of worldwide expansion of snow cover, mountain glacier growth, and Arctic pack ice which began in the 15th century and became pronounced by the 17th century. There were three major glacial advances in the Alps, Norway, Iceland and Alaska and elsewhere around 1650, 1750 and 1850 separated by slight withdrawals. Average annual temperatures in England and perhaps worldwide were 1 to 2 degrees Centigrade colder than they were before or since (as at 1974). In the USA average Midwestern temperatures in the 1850's were as much as 4 degrees C. colder than they are in 1974.
You can read it all here:
NOAA & Global Cooling In The 1970s | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
Supporters of renewable energy seem to be blinded to the danger that off shore wind poses to whales. If they were genuinely concerned about nature and helping to protect wildlife then why is this the case?
My 41 wind-threatens-whales articles track federal deception – Watts Up With That?
According to this article they were and it is only due to the Republican controlled states using the courts to enforce anti-trust laws that has stopped them this time. It's a complex web, but just plausible that these corporate giants would work together, like a giant example of group-think. Of course they believed they were doing good by saving the planet.
Read the details here and see what you think:
It’s a win: Bankers are backing away from the Monster Banking Climate Cartel « JoNova
The back bench bill to cut CO2 emissions much faster than the government is currently doing is causing considerable concern and the implications of it for the everyday lives of the people are laid out in this article by Paul Homewood:
The Climate and Nature Bill | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
Very few voters knowingly voted for this, and even this Labour government would not implement it, as it would destroy the economy and with it the chance of any of them being re-elected.
Germany is aiming to cover 80 percent of its electricity demand with renewables by 2030, and have a largely decarbonised power supply by 2035. To make sure the lights stay on at all times as the share of intermittent renewable energy increases and coal is phased out, the Germans plan to build hydrogen-ready gas power plants, but these may not materialise fully as investment risks are too high, warned energy associations BDEW and VKU. Read more here:
Note to UK government - Even Germany is not planning to decarbonise its electricity supply completely by 2030, but they are struggling to achieve 80% by 2035.
Over a period of just a few months the global sea temperature over a large area of the world’s oceans has shown a dramatic reduction of 0.5°C. It is now back to the level seen in 2015.
What this latest episode of climate hysteria shows is that despite vast amounts of computer power and a huge pool of money, most climate science is stuck in a ‘settled’ dark age. Any departure from a climatic norm is seen by activist scientists and their faithful media messengers as a linear progression to Armageddon. The role of natural variation is constantly downplayed.
Recent Temperature Falls Likely to Put a Dampener on ‘Hottest Year Evah’ Stories – The Daily Sceptic
This article is from FoS Climate Science Newsletter - 2024 | Friends of Science
The Gorgon carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) system in Australia commenced operation in August 2019. Naturally occurring carbon dioxide (CO2) is taken from offshore gas reservoirs and injected into a giant sandstone formation two km under the ground. The project is operated by Chevron in joint venture with ExxonMobil and Shell. The Gorgon CCS project was expected to capture 80% of the CO2 emitted, or 4 million tonnes (MtCO2) a year. This report shows that it actually achieved just 1.6 MtCO2 in fiscal year 2024, which is only 30% of its target and the lowest performance since it started in 2019. The project is costing the joint venture almost $1 billion more in 2023 than it did in FY2019-20 to offset the difference and pay for technical problems. The requirement to buy carbon offsets for under performance and problems injection into the sandstone reservoir rose from $2.5 billion in FY2019-20 to $3.2 billion in 2023. Australian Carbon Credit Units are currently priced around $40 a tonne. “The key reason behind Gorgon’s under performance is issues with the reservoir pressure, which has to stay within a certain range. Chevron has implemented measures to remove water from the reservoir and reduce the reservoir pressure.
The chances of Labour meetings its self-imposed target of decarbonising the UK electricity supply by 2030 is a fantasy, says Richard North in this well-informed article:
Net zero: fantasy power | Turbulent Times
Not only will the government completely fail to meet their 2030 target on decarbonising the grid, they are also miles away from their heat pump installation target and the their electric vehicle target - which is probably just as well, as if they had met them they would not have nearly enough electricity to power them!
Dramatic evidence has been published in a number of recent science papers that carbon dioxide levels are already ‘saturated’, meaning little or no further warming is to be expected and rising CO2 levels are all beneficial.
Science Shock: CO2 is Good for the Planet, Peer-Reviewed Studies Suggest – The Daily Sceptic
Mark Mills, who spoke alongside Steve Koonin at the debate shown in yesterday's post, is a very good speaker, and here he is again speaking about EVs. It's only a short ten minute video, but well worth watching,
I recommend this good-natured debate between some very well-informed speakers. On the affirmative side were Kerry Emanuel and Robert Pyndick, both authors of books on the subject, and on the negative team were Steve Koonin and Mark Mills, also highly qualified.
MIT Free Speech Alliance Debate: Is Decarbonization Worth the Cost?
You can read a summary of the "no" side here:
The Paris Accords As “Climate Insurance”—Unaffordable and Unnecessary - Clintel
Below is an interesting piece from Richard North. He observes that net zero targets are not being met due to public resistance. This is going to lead to a dilemma. Will they try to force costly change and risk even more unpopularity, or will they abandon the targets and push them further ahead?
Miliband's dash to decarbonise the grid by 2030 will put us in hock to the biggest dictatorship of all: China. He has already approved three huge new solar farms in eastern England, despite the official planning inspectorate concluding that one in particular would involve an unacceptable loss of productive farmland.
The Science Is Clear: Warming Since 2000 Is NOT Due To Man-Made GHG Emissions
This bill, should it ever become law, will restrict our freedom like nothing we have experienced since war time. It has an innocent sounding name, but it is a ravenous wolf in sheep's clothing. Amazingly it has the backing of around 180 MPs, but its "ambition" would ruin our economy and put up prices in equal measure. The rest of the world would be more likely to laugh at us than attempt to copy us.
Read more here: Like Net Zero–But Worse | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
Here is the website trying to get support for it:
For the first time in 21 months, global ocean temperatures have returned to levels seen in December 2015—nine years ago. Let that sink in for a moment. After two years of being bombarded with claims that the Earth’s oceans were on an unstoppable trajectory of warming, we find ourselves… back where we were nearly a decade ago.
Ocean Temperatures and Climate Hysteria: A Lesson in Perspective – Watts Up With That?
Many climate scientists in the USA are worried about whether they will still have a job when President Trump moves into the White House on the 20th January. It will be interesting to see just how much he will change the situation in his second term. What he needs to do is to allow an open debate with time for the sceptics to put their case to the country.
The track by Sir Starmer and the Granny Harmers, which mocks Labour’s decision to strip millions of pensioners of the benefit, is topping music downloads charts with a week to go before Christmas Day. The single is already topping the EE Big Top 40, which ranks songs based on downloads and Apple Music streams.
We are constantly being told that some proportion of any weather event is being made worse by the extra CO2 in the atmosphere by those pushing the idea, but in reality this simply is not possible as this article shows.
There is dismay across Europe as the calm weather drastically reduces the output from wind farms. It is something that is so obvious and yet political leaders appear to have ignored it.
The accuracy of Met Office weather stations was not a big issue when these were just filed away, but today they assume much greater importance as they are used to provide evidence of how much warming has been achieved and also whether pensioners receive a cold weather payment. In view of this the poor state of the Met Office weather stations is a disgrace and it needs to be urgently improved.
Here is a link to a review of a typical example:
Bainbridge DCNN 2212 – This would be funny but only if it was not true. | Tallbloke's Talkshop
Recent changes made by the Met Office to its climate average pages shows that the state-funded operation is fully aware of the growing interest in its entire temperature recording business. This interest has grown because the Met Office is fully committed to using its data to promote the Net Zero political fantasy. But it is silent on the biggest concern that has been raised of late, namely the promotion of temperatures, accurate to one hundredth of a degree centigrade, obtained from a nationwide network where nearly eight out of 10 stations are so poorly sited they have internationally-recognised ‘uncertainties’ as high as 5°C.
This is really good news for all those small island nations, and yet this is not headline news on our TV news bulletins or in the press. It does not fit with the climate emergency theme. Read the linked article and watch the video in it.
Fake Climate Doom…Recent Research Shows “Vast Majority” Of Pacific Atoll Islands Have Grown In Size
What lies behind the fanatical push for green energy in the West? One major player has been discovered to be the Chinese Communist Party. Obviously they have a lot to gain by selling their products to us, while at the same time weakening our independence and leaving us with a less reliable system of electricity production. Read all the details here:
We know that computer models of the climate are not very accurate. If they were, they would all agree with one another and they would be able to predict the future climate with more precision when they are fed with data from the recent past - but they don't. As we uncover more factors that affect the climate we can understand why this is the case. Here is a case in point:
Amazon forests really are cloud machines (and the climate models had no idea) « JoNova
Isoprene is mentioned in the text and just for the benefit of any who are curious, this is emitted by many broad leaved trees. It is a reactive compound which can form a polymer which is a form of natural rubber.
The Met Office have only been using extremely exposed sites such as Aberdaron and Capel Curig for a few years, both opening in 1993. Pembrey Sands, another regular on the wind gust list was also opened in that same year. It is almost as if the Met Office wanted to make people believe winds were getting stronger! What the BBC refuse to tell viewers is that the storms of the 1980s and 90s were much more severe than anything seen since, which even the Met Office have been forced to admit. Read the details at the links below:
Storm Darragh | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
Storm Darragh’s Winds Were 60 mph, Not 90 mph | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
"A group of Korean polar scientists have made the astonishing discovery that summer temperatures in Antarctica plunged by a massive 1°C in just 20 years from 1979-1999 and have since been on pause. These findings are ignored in the mainstream media, where a simplistic opinion that humans control the climate by using hydrocarbons is the main driver of panic designed to implement the evil Net Zero project. "
Dramatic 1°C Plunge Recorded in Recent Antarctica Summer Temperatures – The Daily Sceptic
Below is a clip from Talk TV which features an energy expert quoting statistics about UK energy use and associated costs. It is very sad to hear how badly led we have been over the past 20 years and the opportunities we have wasted.
The energy u-turn is a recognition that his policy was completely impossible.
"Environmental OBSESSION!" | Labour's Energy Target 'Back-Track'
Below is an extract from the latest news from "down under". Read it all at the link.
If your company has agreed to be ready to shut down at a moments notice on a warm day, that’s not being on “Standby to Close” your business is a ““pre-activated” extra reserve.”
In Renewable World, bad is good: your smelter used to make aluminum, but now you can sell “electricity use reduction” as well, and the AEMO (the grid manager in Australia) will call you a “Virtual Power Plant” too. Australian companies can now sell their own blackouts back to the grid.
Those who control the energy, control the people. Every part of this trend is a step in a dumb direction. We’re paying more for less in every single aspect. More people sit around being useless, or half useful, or distracted. More companies make fewer goods. And more government makes more government which is the worst thing of all…
The public are being deliberately misinformed about the true cost of electricity obtained from wind turbines. The reason for this is clearly to try to keep people onboard with accepting the blight of these monster structures and the multitude of pylons. But in the end the truth must come out if prices continue to rise. Then support will rapidly turn to anger at the government. Read this article for details:
Using the excuse that they were trying to reduce fossil fuel use, three very big banks used their massive wealth to invest in coal and then increase electricity prices. It is an extraordinary story and shows the huge profits to be made while claiming to be saving the planet.
The following short video shows members of the public attending a council meeting to challenge councillors on their "climate emergency" stance, and finds they are now considering taking a fresh look at it.
Although this is not a new debate it is still worth watching because the arguments brought out in it are still relevant today and the standard of both speakers is excellent. A vote was taken at the start of the debate and at the end. Both results were only revealed at the end. I will not spoil the ending for you.
Is Carbon Dioxide Endangering the Planet? Craig Idso vs. Jeffrey Bennett. A Debate
In this lecture Dr Sheahen focuses on the work of Professors Will Happer and William van Wijngaarden in their pioneering work in calculating the real-world Global Warming Potentials (GWPs) of the five most common Green-House Gases (GHGs). He emphasizes how their calculations have now been precisely verified by satellite measurements, thus validating their research. These results verify the actual low GWPs of these GHGs, and, in particular, of the irrelevancy of the impact of Methane on climate. The results have profound implications, particularly for agriculturally based economies like those of Ireland and New Zealand.
“Methane – The Irrelevant Green-House Gas” Dr Thomas P Sheahen