In science, the raw data is sacrosanct, but a new type of analysis shows hundreds of anomalies and oddities in BOM (Australian Bureau of Meteorology) Raw data, and whole months of supposedly raw records have been cut and pasted, in one instance as far as 40 years earlier.
Tom Berger is a specialist in data-based deception analysis who has assisted the FBI in the past. So he has analyzed the BOM raw data in new very detailed ways. He found adjustments in one site were predictable in a machine-learning way from another site 800km away, suggesting that “the adjustments were following a systematic, network-wide pattern”, not just with an issue at a single station.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Climate Science welcomes your views/messages.